CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

how to decrease the y+ value around turbine blade

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By Ahmed Saeed Mansour
  • 1 Post By Ahmed Saeed Mansour
  • 1 Post By alex-bishop

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 27, 2016, 22:01
Default how to decrease the y+ value around turbine blade
  #1
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 9
alex-bishop is on a distinguished road
when i use turbogrid to creat mesh i do not know how to decrease the y+ value around blade. the value is in the passage tab. i want some help from you.
i appreciate it very much.
alex-bishop is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 30, 2016, 22:02
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Have a nice time!
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: mech.eng.ahmedmansour@gmail.com
Posts: 291
Rep Power: 11
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is on a distinguished road
What is the required y+ that you have to use?
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2016, 04:43
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 9
alex-bishop is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahmed Saeed Mansour View Post
What is the required y+ that you have to use?
i think 20-300. i am studying turbine. i also want to know how to choose reasonable Y+ range. can you give me some advices?
alex-bishop is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2016, 14:11
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Have a nice time!
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: mech.eng.ahmedmansour@gmail.com
Posts: 291
Rep Power: 11
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is on a distinguished road
Okay, the idea behind y+ is to calculate the first layer height"the first cell near the wall or the airfoil surface" to capture a specific physical phenomena that requires high resolution cells"fine grid"...One of these phenomenas is the boundary layer especially near the airfoil's surface....So, you have to know the recommended y+ for your simulation and you can get it from google or any CFD reference that covers the y+ illustration and how to calculate the first layer height for internal and external flow..They use some basic and empirical equations...So, the 1st thing now is to tell me the required y+ then you can substitute it the equations to get the 1st cell height then we can enter the next stage...
Check out these
y+:
http://www.computationalfluiddynamic...t-cell-height/

The following link is about a CFD course..The Dr. illustrated the idea of y+ in a video but I don't remember the number of it so try to find it out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPnpqsAkoR8

Mesh independence
http://www.computationalfluiddynamic...pendent-study/

My tutorial on youtube

https://youtu.be/2951JXtWJ4w

Thanks
alex-bishop likes this.
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2016, 06:04
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 9
alex-bishop is on a distinguished road
thank you very much. it is really helpful. i also want to ask a question about the wall function. does it mean i can not get detail about flow status in laminar sublayer of boundary layer when i use such as k-e model with wall function ?
alex-bishop is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2016, 06:19
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 9
alex-bishop is on a distinguished road
and i want to know that why y+ can not be too small ?
alex-bishop is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2016, 06:23
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Have a nice time!
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: mech.eng.ahmedmansour@gmail.com
Posts: 291
Rep Power: 11
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is on a distinguished road
Dear Alex, study these couple of pages in Ansys Fluent user and theory guide..
Theory guide "page 112-131"

http://www.mediafire.com/file/6ww6sn...eory+Guide.pdf

And user guide " Chapter 12 k-e model"

http://www.mediafire.com/file/3q0hs3...sers+Guide.pdf

Y+ is set to lower than 1 if the physical phenomena requires a very high fine mesh near the surface such as the surface of the airfoil...to study the sublayer of the boundary layer.

After that if you have questions ...I am ready...Keep going
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2016, 06:31
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Have a nice time!
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: mech.eng.ahmedmansour@gmail.com
Posts: 291
Rep Power: 11
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is on a distinguished road
And at some simulations the too small y+ may cause solution instabilities so we do not use too low values of y+
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2016, 10:52
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 9
alex-bishop is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahmed Saeed Mansour View Post
And at some simulations the too small y+ may cause solution instabilities so we do not use too low values of y+
in this picture the stadard wall function was used with k-e model. y+=75. we can see that we get the flow detail in logarithmic layer but we can not get detail about buffer layer and laminar layer. so i want to know that if we can not get flow detail in laminar layer when we use wall function?
Attached Images
File Type: png 2.PNG (41.6 KB, 28 views)
alex-bishop is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2016, 11:36
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Have a nice time!
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: mech.eng.ahmedmansour@gmail.com
Posts: 291
Rep Power: 11
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is on a distinguished road
You can read about that in page 122 in the theory guide...I think if you wanna get the viscous sublayer you have to make y+ equal to 1 and use enhanced wall treatment in k-e but this will require a very fine grid near the wall.
alex-bishop likes this.
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2016, 21:40
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 9
alex-bishop is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahmed Saeed Mansour View Post
You can read about that in page 122 in the theory guide...I think if you wanna get the viscous sublayer you have to make y+ equal to 1 and use enhanced wall treatment in k-e but this will require a very fine grid near the wall.
thank you very much.
alex-bishop is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2016, 02:34
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
Have a nice time!
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: mech.eng.ahmedmansour@gmail.com
Posts: 291
Rep Power: 11
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is on a distinguished road
Not at all dear Alex...Keep goin'
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
turbigrid y+


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem in conducting CFD of analysis of wind turbine blade atulpat CFX 16 August 17, 2013 04:09
Wind Turbine Blade rotation mmd_knr FLUENT 1 August 8, 2012 14:52
Calculating lift force of a wind turbine blade problem LittleBart CFX 4 June 29, 2011 02:33
force acting on gas turbine blade.... vvj Main CFD Forum 1 March 3, 2010 01:04
Wind Turbine Blade Geometry SeanieB Main CFD Forum 0 November 27, 2009 10:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39.