CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Verification and Validation needed for LES model?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 6, 2017, 18:15
Default Verification and Validation needed for LES model?
New Member
Kyle Leathers
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
fish500 is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I have created a 3D plume with turbulent water flow triggered by staggered blocks along the bottom and an injected additional variable in the middle of the plume using LES in CFX. After reading a CFD textbook and other articles, I know most experiments require some level of verification and validation, but am not sure exactly what steps to take. The most basic verification in convergence by residuals lower than 1E-4 has been met and courant numbers are close to 1 already. I've read papers that have compared horizontal turbulent intensity (u'u') vertical profiles of the model and experimental data, so that is one method I think would be helpful too. What are the standards that must be met to verify and validate a LES model? This may be a very simple question, but I have had trouble finding a clear answer in ANSYS resources or online.
fish500 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2017, 19:18
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
I am glad to hear you ask this question - too many times on the forum there are questions about why simulation results are weird, and 95% of the time the answer is because they did not do the basic checks that your simulation is accurate.

Validation and verification of CFD (and numerical methods in general) is a complex topic in itself, and any works have been written on it. We have a FAQ which discusses some basics:

The core of it is to check your convergence tolerance, mesh resolution and time step size (if transient) is OK. You do this using a sensitivity analysis. Simple sensitivity analysis on convergence tolerance would be:
* Do a simulation with a certain convergence tolerance (say 1e-4)
* Extract from the simulation the results which are important to you. It could be pressure drop, temperature of something, flow rate; what ever is important for your work.
* Do a significant change to the convergence tolerance. I would recommend going to a convergence tolerance of 1e-5, so x10 tighter. Repeat the simulation and converge to the tighter tolerance.
* Extract the parameters of interest to you. Are they the same as the looser tolerance, within an error you are happy accept? If yes then you can use the 1e-4 convergence tolerance as a good convergence tolerance for your work. If not, then repeat the process with a tighter tolerance again (1e-6 would be the obvious next step) and continue until the results do converge.

You do this process on the mesh (halving the edge length each time) and time step size (halving the time step size each time), and then you have established the convergence tolerance, mesh and time step size required for the accuracy you want.

This is a very simple, crude way of doing it. The link in this FAQ: starts describing some more sophisticated methods such as Richardson extrapolation. Also the book "Computational Fluid Dynamics" by Roache is the seminal textbook in this field. He describes methods of speeding the process up and quantitative methods of establishing simulation accuracy.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote


additional variable, les model, turbulence analysis, validation, verification

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Verification and Validation databases for CFD Reeb Main CFD Forum 3 December 18, 2016 15:20
Request for Lagrangian Particle Tracking Validation or Verification Paper Mojtaba.a OpenFOAM Verification & Validation 6 May 23, 2016 01:47
verification and validation karthikpaulraj Main CFD Forum 2 February 22, 2015 08:04
Verification and validation mashinsazi Main CFD Forum 0 November 28, 2014 02:36
New OpenFOAM Verification & Validation Forum Opened jola OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 2 October 1, 2011 17:21

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:06.