CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

question about opening boundary conditions

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Jason

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 8, 2004, 13:57
Default question about opening boundary conditions
Posts: n/a
Hi, I am running a transient simulation on pulsejet. The outlet is specified as opening, which has only one option---subsonic. However, for pulsejet, velocity can easily go beyond mach 1 at exit(for my case, the max mach number 1.7). We also have compression/expension waves travel back and forth in the tube and combustion chamber. I am just wondering, with supersonic flow at the opening, whether CFX5.7 can model this well, or my results are just wrong.

I specified 'pressure and direction (stable)' at the outlet(opening) with a reletive Pressure=1e5[pa]. My reference pressure is 0[pa]. I use k-omega model.

Currently I am trying to match my simulation results with experimental results. (I monitor pressures at three different points, from which the experimental data are obtained.) The two results looks similar except for the difference at the outlet point. It seems like the reflected expension wave should be stronger or the model has missed a few waves. It it mainly because of the supersonic flow at outlet(opening)?

Other than the outlet boundary conditions, what else should I pay attention to?

Thank you very much!
vijayarahavan likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 9, 2004, 05:06
Default Re: question about opening boundary conditions
Posts: n/a
Hi Jason,

presssure doesn´t travel upstream in supersonic regime so it doesn´t makes sense to set pressure and an supersonic outlet BC would be more realistic. In addition, a finer mesh where you expect waves is desirable (in a steady flow mesh adaption fix the problem) to capture better the waves and even, if the waves are very packed and mesh too coarse, it might be the case, to miss some of them.

Just any ideas, not an expertise oppinion. Hope it helps

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 9, 2004, 09:35
Default Re: question about opening boundary conditions
Posts: n/a
Many thanks, pi.

I was also wondering whether it is due to the current coarse mesh. I can import current ccl file to the new mesh, right?

Regarding the outlet, what we want to do is to measure the thrust of the pulsejet, so backflow(if there is) should be considered and measured in the model. That's why I first set it as an opening. However, the simulation results shows we have SOME supersonic flow in each cycle.

Another question is about the thrust calculation. I noticed there is a 'Wall force summary' in CFX-sover. Can I use it to compute the pulsejet thrust and how? Anyone knows?

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Implementation of boundary conditions for FVM Tom Main CFD Forum 7 August 26, 2014 05:58
Boundary Conditions Thomas P. Abraham Main CFD Forum 20 July 7, 2013 05:05
mesh file for flow over a circular cylinder Ardalan Main CFD Forum 6 April 17, 2010 23:40
Question about boundary conditions Damiano FLUENT 2 January 30, 2007 04:59
question about implementing boundary conditions saygin Main CFD Forum 0 July 6, 2006 07:08

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:44.