CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CFX

Stage Interface Without Frame Change

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 20, 2005, 09:52
Default Stage Interface Without Frame Change
Posts: n/a

My doubt is about the interface options offered by CFX 5 in the Turbo Mode.

CFX documentation says the following about the stage interface "…Two or more blade passages are solved simultaneously with circumferential "averaging" between rotating and stationary regions. The stage averaging at the frame change interface incurs a one-time mixing loss. This loss is equivalent to assuming that the physical mixing supplied by the relative motion between components is sufficiently large to cause any upstream velocity profile to mix out prior to entering the downstream machine component."

What does CFX do when we use a stage interface without frame change. Is there a mixing plane assumed again? Because if there is no frame change then there is no relative motion and therefore no mixing. So if we use a mixing plane in this situation we would be non-physical as far as the mixing is concerned.

This is a worrisome issue if there are some CFX experts or CFX support guys who could answer this it would be great.

Regards, Vikram

PS: Robin, any comments?
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2005, 22:14
Default Re: Stage Interface Without Frame Change
Posts: n/a
Why are you worried? If there is no frame change then don't use the Stage model???

Perhaps you are talking about the "Same Frame with Stage" frame change option? This model still circumferentially averages the flow from upstream to downstream. It is a model after all and may or may not be appropriate to your particular situation.

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 21, 2005, 04:55
Default Re: Stage Interface Without Frame Change
Posts: n/a
Hi Neale,

I am worried because there is a pitch change. With a stage interface I can reduce the mesh size by a factor of two. If I use a None interface I have to employ multiples of a grid on both sides(7 on 1 and 2 on the other instead of 1 on each side). The mesh size is huge even if I use a stage interface. So I don't have time to experiment with both the interfaces.

Regards, Vikram

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFX does not continue Shafiul CFX 10 February 17, 2011 08:57
GGI (General Grid Interface) Connections feixiangniao CFX 4 January 14, 2010 20:51
RPM in Wind Turbine Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 05:05
BlockMeshmergePatchPairs hjasak OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 11 August 15, 2008 07:36
Mesh motion applied to an internal interface lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 March 12, 2008 22:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:31.