CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

averaging on flow field

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 23, 2019, 08:02
Default averaging on flow field
  #1
Senior Member
 
Zese
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 102
Rep Power: 12
zese is on a distinguished road
Dear Friends

I simulated a flow inside a diverging pipe and I want to average my velocity field in azimuthal direction (Theta) to have axisymmetric flow field on a 2D plane. I thought that defining several plane inside the pipe with 30 degree difference may help but the number of nodes in each plane is different. do you know what can I do? or do you know which additional software would do that for me?

Thanks very much
zese is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 23, 2019, 18:33
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
You could export the data and do it outside CFX (eg matlab, python etc).

But I do not know why you are doing this, what output you want or what you mean by planes with 30 degree difference and why different number of nodes is relevant.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 24, 2019, 04:44
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Zese
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 102
Rep Power: 12
zese is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
You could export the data and do it outside CFX (eg matlab, python etc).

But I do not know why you are doing this, what output you want or what you mean by planes with 30 degree difference and why different number of nodes is relevant.
thanks very much for your answer. let me be clear because I think my question was vague. I have a 3D simulation (picture.1) then I want to average velocity field (ur,utheta and uaxial) in theta direction to have picture. 2. I need it for further calculation with axisymmetric assumption. I have tried different ways:
1. I exported data in 3D and imported to MATLAB; then I tried to fitt a function the velocities and take an integral in theta direction which was unsuccessful
2. In CFD post I considered 8 plane with 45 degree difference in theta direction and exported velocity fields on these plane and avaraged between them.
I am not sure if this method is right or not.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg pic.1.jpg (19.7 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg pic.2.jpg (4.0 KB, 6 views)
zese is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 24, 2019, 18:55
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
This should be straight forward in matlab/python from a 3D data export from CFD-Post. So check your maths in matlab.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Averaging a velocity field (SW flow simulation) joaopffg FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM 14 August 25, 2017 03:23
MHD and existing flow field sina_mech FLUENT 1 March 22, 2015 19:18
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
rerun with same flow field, different fluid props Tim Phoenics 0 March 3, 2004 14:51
fluid flow fundas ram Main CFD Forum 5 June 17, 2000 21:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13.