CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

time step for VOF equations

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Gert-Jan

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 5, 2020, 08:08
Default time step for VOF equations
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 10
ehsan1363 is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone.
According to section "7.18.5.5.Timestep" in ''ANSYS-CFX Solver Modeling Guide'' it is often helpful to reduce the timestep for the volume fraction equations by an order of magnitude below that of the other equations. As CFX has an implicit solver, I need to know how I can use a different time step for VOF equations?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 001.jpg (146.6 KB, 13 views)
ehsan1363 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 5, 2020, 09:04
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,827
Rep Power: 27
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
In a fully converged solution (residuals, imbalances, values in monitoring points, .....), the timestep has no effect on the solution.
The way to get to this converged solution is just easier by using a small timestep for volume fraction. A reduction by a factor 10 is quite blunt. A factor 2, 3 or 4 might work as well, and will be faster. Just give it a try.
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2020, 03:45
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 10
ehsan1363 is on a distinguished road
Hi Gert-Jan,
I need to know how we can reduce the time step only for VOF equations. As CFX has an implicit solver we can not change the time step only for VOF equations whereas the CFX user manual says it is possible!! I want to know the way. I don't know if I should use CCL or not.
ehsan1363 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2020, 03:56
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,827
Rep Power: 27
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
You can use a different (false) timesteps in Steady state calculations. That is what the help is about. You cannot do this in transient calculations.

For steady state: In CFX-Pre go to Solver Control > Equation Class Settings. There select the equation for the Mass fractions and choose a timescale factor (or Physical timestep) which is substantial smaller than the time setting in the Basic-Settings-tab.
Ashkan Kashani likes this.
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2020, 05:02
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 10
ehsan1363 is on a distinguished road
thank you so much for your point of view.
ehsan1363 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
bash script for pseudo-parallel usage of reconstructPar kwardle OpenFOAM Post-Processing 41 August 23, 2023 02:48
Transient simulation not converging skabilan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 14 December 16, 2019 23:12
time step continuity problem in VAWT simulation lpz_michele OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 February 22, 2018 19:50
Floating point exception error lpz_michele OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 53 October 19, 2015 02:50
plot over time fferroni OpenFOAM Post-Processing 7 June 8, 2012 07:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17.