|
[Sponsors] |
Monitoring mole fraction at a boundary outlet |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 19, 2020, 13:26 |
Monitoring mole fraction at a boundary outlet
|
#1 |
Senior Member
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13 |
I am trying to figure out an expression to monitor the mole fraction of liquid and vapour methanol at a boundary.
May need two expressions, one for liquid and one for vapour. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance. Using ANSYS academic software. I have tried this, it didn't work "Bad expression value 'MethanolM detected in parameter Expression Value' in object .... molf(MethanolM)@out MethanolM is the liquid which is being boiled, at the outlet there should be some methanol liquid and some vapour. Last edited by visitor; June 20, 2020 at 03:14. |
|
June 19, 2020, 15:38 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,804
Rep Power: 32 |
What is the name of the material used in the software, i.e. MATERIAL: <name>? MetanolM or something else?
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
June 19, 2020, 16:46 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13 |
I have named it as MethanolM. It's just Methanol. Trying to find out mole fractions of vapour and liquid methanol.
Also the liquid methanol is going to boil, I am looking for TASCfliw RGP. Or any other method which can simulate methanol liquid to vapour phase change. Thanks. |
|
June 20, 2020, 03:11 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13 |
This is another issue I am dealing with. Methanol material properties. I am looking for Zero Pressure Coefficients for the Fourth Order Polynomial. As an alternative to NASA inputs.
Any tips, links? Please. Last edited by visitor; June 20, 2020 at 05:04. |
|
June 20, 2020, 10:42 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,804
Rep Power: 32 |
There are several ways to access Molar Fraction
1 - Create a monitor point at a position of interest, and select MethanolM.Molar Fraction 2 - Create a monitor point expression, and set the expression to ave(MethanolM.Molar Fraction)@BoundaryOfInterest, or ave(MethanolM.Molar Fraction)@VolumeOfInterest Hope the above helps,
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
June 20, 2020, 12:04 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13 |
Thanks, Opaque 👍.
In the attached data sheet; I am trying to figure which are the Upper interval coefficients, and Lower interval coefficients. For methanol, any tips which are the Upper a1 ....a7, lower a1 ....a7, from the attached data sheet? Again thanks in advance. |
|
June 20, 2020, 12:30 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13 |
I have entered the following expression;
ave(MethanolM.Molar Fraction)@BoundaryOfInterest Got the following message in the monitor tab, while trying to link this expression. " The variable 'Molar Fraction' referenced by parameter 'Expression Value' in object'/Flow:Flow Analysis ....is not allowed to have a phase prefix. " It sounds like i need to go back to the materials property tab. Find a suitable materials property for methanol, which can be boiled and evaporated. |
|
June 20, 2020, 15:27 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,827
Rep Power: 27 |
you at least should use:
areaAve(MethanolM.Molar Fraction)@BoundaryOfInterest or massFlowAve(MethanolM.Molar Fraction)@BoundaryOfInterest or volumeAve(MethanolM.Molar Fraction)@VolumeOfInterest Last edited by Gert-Jan; June 20, 2020 at 17:12. |
|
June 21, 2020, 04:29 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13 |
Thanks Gert.
Will try it out. It's interesting that when I try the conventional way by selecting the coordinates point (Output Control>monitor), could not see Molar Fraction. For now i have selected MethanolM.Volume Fraction. Still don't know what to enter for material properties. Need something to take care of phase change, boiling. I have selected General Material for methanol and: - Molar mass 32.94 [kg kmol^-1] Density 791 [kg m^-3] Specific heat capacity 2500 [J kg^-1 K^-1] Q1:: Reference state ?? Default settings are for Specified Point ; Q2:: Ref. Temperature 25 C Q3:: Reference Specific Enthalpy >Ref. Spec. Enthalpy 0 J/kg Q4:: Reference Specific Entropy>Ref. Spec. Entropy 0 J/kg/K Buoyancy Properties Q5:: Value>Thermal Expansivity 11.9e-4 [K^-1] Basically methanol named MethanolM is present in water, and set to boil. Water selected IAPWS Library, this takes care if water phase change. Not to sure with methanol material properties setup. I have this link with materials property on methanol. What can be extracted from the link below to fill Q1 to Q5? Deleted link*** Last edited by visitor; June 21, 2020 at 07:16. |
|
June 22, 2020, 04:49 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13 |
Don't know if this suffices for a fourth order polynomial for Methanol, and zero pressure coefficients. If someone can tell me this is correct, I can progress with it and share it with others.
Please see attached pdf. |
|
June 22, 2020, 05:05 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,827
Rep Power: 27 |
If you go to Materials you need to go to Import Library Data to import Methanol. Go to Gas Phase Combustion and select CH3OHvl. This is a vapour Liquid pair for methanol. When using these, you can include evaporation since the liquid and gas are linked automatically.
You need the same for water: H2Ovl Be carefull, the CFD does not use any activity coefficients, azeotrope or whatsoever. If you need to include that as well, you indeed need your own materials. But then I'm out. Regarding the monitor points, if you have your mouse on the monitoring point definition in Pre, use your RMB and select: "Edit in command editor". There you can change the Volume fraction in Mole fraction using your keyboard. Hope it works. |
|
June 22, 2020, 07:42 |
|
#12 |
Senior Member
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13 |
Thanks Gert. Will try out your suggestions.
Just for sharing, i did get vapour with default methanol material properties. See attached screenshot for inputs. It's just that I am not sure if the "Reference State" inputs are correct. With Ref. Temperature 25 C, and Reference Pressure 1 atm. For Reference Specific Enthalpy and Reference Specific Entropy, ?? I don't and don't if needed for vaporising. Thanks |
|
June 22, 2020, 08:55 |
|
#13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,804
Rep Power: 32 |
Quote:
Do you have an entry such MATERIAL: MethanolM anywhere? Based on the message you do not. You cannot compute the Molar Fraction of a mixture, but you can compute the Molar Fraction of a component in the mixture. Q: which materials is your mixture made of?
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
||
June 22, 2020, 15:10 |
|
#14 |
Senior Member
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13 |
The liquid mixture is 0.9 water and 0.1 methanol in volume fractions. I do get vapour which is then condensed. Specific enthalpy was set at -727e3 J/kg at reference temperature 25 C.
Now with gas phase combustion materials, CH3OHvl, I got this error message in Fluid Specific Models; "When using a homogeneous binary mixture one equilibrium constraint and one equilibrium fraction must be specified". Question? Which is which for CH3OH & CH3OHl? Equilibrium constraint/fraction? Similar for water, H2O & H2Ol? The other error message " Equilibrium phase change in one phase in a multiphase run is not supported by the solver for this combination of thermodynamic states. " Thanks |
|
June 23, 2020, 04:19 |
|
#15 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,827
Rep Power: 27 |
Either gas (CH3OHv) or liquid (CH3OHl) is calculated. The other is the constraint: 1-calculated fraction. You pick one, I would pick the one from which you have the most.
The second message says you cannot have CH3OHvl combination simultaneaously with H2Ovl. It is one or the other. This limits the options you have when modeling the combined evaporation of water and methanol simultaneously. If you really need it, you need to go back to your initial approach. Or combine it somehow. Contact ANSYS. |
|
June 23, 2020, 05:07 |
|
#16 |
Senior Member
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13 |
Thanks Gert & Opaque. I can include you in the aknowledgement section of paper, when I get round to writing up. If you accept, please give me your email, thanks.
I am just interested in methanol, mole fraction at the condenser outlet. Not interested in water. I assume if I ignore this message, everything will be fine, will try it out. " Equilibrium phase change in one phase in a multiphase run is not supported by the solver for this combination of thermodynamic states. " Thanks |
|
June 23, 2020, 06:40 |
|
#17 |
Senior Member
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13 |
The equilibrium/constraint issue resolved. Though I am not too sure, if for example the liquid phase is constrained. This should show once validation against experimental data is done. The liquid phase, will change in fractions, as boiling happen.
Regarding below, I have suppressed message and run processing. Output for water and methanol volume fractions are similar. Looking for a solution for this, obviously I will need equilibrium phase change in the two phases, water and methanol. " Equilibrium phase change in one phase in a multiphase run is not supported by the solver for this combination of thermodynamic states. " Thanks. |
|
June 24, 2020, 01:39 |
|
#18 |
Senior Member
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13 |
After suppressing the warning message
" Equilibrium phase change .... " I got a result, methanol is twice (about 2.4) the amount of water in volume fraction at the condenser outlet. Now I am trying to measure the liquid vapour equilibrium, as a check. Liquid mole evaporation must equal vapour mole in equilibrium condition. Measured mole concentration CH3OH gave 36.38 mol/m3, and CH3OH l gave 24540.6 mol/m3. It doesn't make sense. |
|
June 24, 2020, 06:20 |
|
#19 |
Senior Member
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13 |
Thanks for all participants.
I think we have covered a few interesting points. It will be good if more database is entered. Unless I am wrong. |
|
June 24, 2020, 06:59 |
|
#20 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,827
Rep Power: 27 |
Take 1 m3 of methanol with a density of 792 kg/m3 and a molar weight of 32 g/mol makes 24750 mol/m3. Looks correct to me.
However, I don't know: - what your intention is; - what question you exactly have; - how you determined these numbers; - in which phase they are present (if any); - how your geometry looks like, In other words: don't expect us to be the Wizard of CFX to help you without any background/knowlegde/pictures/etc. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
3D Windturbine simulation in SU2 | k.vimalakanthan | SU2 | 15 | October 12, 2023 05:53 |
Can I achieve better convergence? | sheaker | CFX | 12 | September 19, 2019 15:36 |
Error - Solar absorber - Solar Thermal Radiation | MichaelK | CFX | 12 | September 1, 2016 05:15 |
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX | Anna Tian | CFX | 1 | June 16, 2013 06:28 |
RPM in Wind Turbine | Pankaj | CFX | 9 | November 23, 2009 04:05 |