|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 269
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
I have performed a run in CFX, then for some reason I had to pause the run and turn off the computer. Now, to continue the run after clicking on solution on workbench, CFX-solver takes the original .def file as the solver input file and initialization option is set to automatic, while continue history from is unchecked and the initial values file name is set to the original file I used. Is it not wrong to use the original file as the initial values since the simulation has run for time? Sometimes CFX-solver takes a .res file instead of a .def file as the solver input. Is it correct?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,948
Rep Power: 28 ![]() |
If you use your RMB (Right Mouse Button) on the solution block, can't you select "Continue Calculation". That should do the trick.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,892
Rep Power: 33 ![]() |
The snapshot looks correct.
Solver input file = original input file Initial Values File = results from the partial run you did before turning off the computer.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 269
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Should I change CFX_001.res to the partial transient result to continue the run? I think "provided by current solution data" from the screenshot means that CFX-solver doesn't use the initial steady-state results although "continue calculation" may not be suitable for a transient run that was intialized with steady-state results. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,892
Rep Power: 33 ![]() |
Was the Workbench cell up to date?
It seems the project got into an "Out of date" state.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 269
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
There is a tick on solution with the number 22. I can right click on the solution and select "Accept interrupted solution as up-to-date". After that I choose "Continue calculation" but again the run exits with the same error. It seems Workbench doesn't operate correctly when I click on the solution to continue a run.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,948
Rep Power: 28 ![]() |
In general, I don't find Workbench very reliable. Therefore I prefer to use CFX standalone. Than I have full control on what input files and initial guesses are used. Moreover, files are removed when I want them to be deleted. That is better than letting Workbench to have full control, with the risk of loosing precious results. I have seen that multiple times, especially when running Fluent under Workbench (but that is different story).
As a result, I only use Workbench for Geometry and meshing. Thereafter, I close it and start with the CFX-launcher. Recently someone renamed Workbench to Doesn'tWotkbench. That holds to some extent. Only if you work in Workbench with more applications than solely CFX, than I see added value. Otherwise not. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to adjust the velocity field during the CFX solver running? | tangleiplus | CFX | 17 | January 22, 2019 12:42 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Help with element size | sandri_92 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 14 | November 14, 2018 08:54 |
Wrong scale between ICEM and CFX in Workbench | Borstinator | ANSYS | 0 | July 12, 2018 09:46 |
new workstation for running 5 Million size mesh on CFX with rigid body solver | aks | Hardware | 5 | August 20, 2013 08:12 |
Running Multiple Simulations from Workbench 12.1 | Josh | CFX | 3 | August 10, 2010 20:51 |