Axisymmetric 2D mesh adaptation - ERROR

Pepe · May 30, 2011, 05:10

Hi,
does the 'mesh adaptation' work with 2D axisymmetric approach in CFX?

When
1) I import 2D mesh as FLUENT (*.msh) --> axisymmetric the solver works properly

2) I import (the same) 2D mesh as FLUENT (*.msh) --> axisymmetric. Then I set up the 'Mesh adaptation' in Pre, the solver returns following error: A negative ELEMENT volume has been detected.... after the adaptation.

3) I import (the same) 2D mesh as FLUENT (*.msh) --> PLANAR. Then I set up the 'Mesh adaptation' in Pre, the solver works properly.

I don't know where the problem is.... Is there any system variable needed to be set?

I use CFX 13

Thank you for replies

ghorrocks · May 30, 2011, 06:23

Mesh adaptation was dropped as a CFX feature a few releases ago and to my knowledge has not returned. Also using Fluent to refine meshes then importing them into CFX-Pre is problematic, I have never got it to work for me.

Pepe · May 30, 2011, 07:52

Thank you Glenn for a quick reply.
My mesh was built in Gambit and imported directly to CFX (I didn't use Fluent before). I suppose, import was successfull, because solver converged OK. But the 'mesh adaptation' could cause the problems.

Is possible, that the adaptation algorithm is not able to operate with the small angle segment, which appears due to axisymmetric import??

I'm gonna to compute a lots of variants, so I prefer CFX to Fluent.

ghorrocks · May 30, 2011, 08:28

Fluent has a "real" 2D solver, so if you have the choice of both solvers I would use Fluent if you have lots of simulations to do.

May 30, 2011, 05:10	Axisymmetric 2D mesh adaptation - ERROR	#1
Pepe New Member Josef Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0	Hi, does the 'mesh adaptation' work with 2D axisymmetric approach in CFX? When 1) I import 2D mesh as FLUENT (.msh) --> axisymmetric the solver works properly 2) I import (the same) 2D mesh as FLUENT (.msh) --> axisymmetric. Then I set up the 'Mesh adaptation' in Pre, the solver returns following error: A negative ELEMENT volume has been detected.... after the adaptation. 3) I import (the same) 2D mesh as FLUENT (.msh) --> PLANAR. Then I set up the 'Mesh adaptation' in Pre, the solver works properly. I don't know where the problem is.... Is there any system variable needed to be set? I use CFX 13 Thank you for replies Last edited by Pepe; May 30, 2011 at 06:54.*

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Moving mesh	Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom)	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	122	June 15, 2014 06:20
OF 1.6 \| Ubuntu 9.10 (64bit) \| GLIBCXX_3.4.11 not found	piprus	OpenFOAM Installation	22	February 25, 2010 13:43
[swak4Foam] groovyBC: problems compiling: "flex: not found" and "undefined reference to ..."	sega	OpenFOAM Community Contributions	12	February 17, 2010 09:30
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file	SSL	FLUENT	2	January 26, 2008 11:55
Compiling problems with hello worldC	fw407	OpenFOAM Installation	21	January 6, 2008 17:38

May 30, 2011, 06:23		#2
ghorrocks Super Moderator Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,931 Rep Power: 145	Mesh adaptation was dropped as a CFX feature a few releases ago and to my knowledge has not returned. Also using Fluent to refine meshes then importing them into CFX-Pre is problematic, I have never got it to work for me.

May 30, 2011, 07:52		#3
Pepe New Member Josef Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0	Thank you Glenn for a quick reply. My mesh was built in Gambit and imported directly to CFX (I didn't use Fluent before). I suppose, import was successfull, because solver converged OK. But the 'mesh adaptation' could cause the problems. Is possible, that the adaptation algorithm is not able to operate with the small angle segment, which appears due to axisymmetric import?? I'm gonna to compute a lots of variants, so I prefer CFX to Fluent.

May 30, 2011, 08:28		#4
ghorrocks Super Moderator Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,931 Rep Power: 145	Fluent has a "real" 2D solver, so if you have the choice of both solvers I would use Fluent if you have lots of simulations to do.