CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > CONVERGE

Questions about boundary refining

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 13, 2024, 05:13
Smile Questions about boundary refining
  #1
New Member
 
Ming wang
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2
vikoel is on a distinguished road
My best friends, please give me some advice. I am definitely in need of your help!

In a steady-state conjugate heat transfer simulation under the stationary grid (i.e., the water jacket), numerical fluctuations occur at the interface of the transition from coarse grid to fine grid in the inlet pipe, with refinement of scale 3 and layers 2 near the boundary wall, scalable wall function, and realizable turbulence model.*

I am curious about how to eliminate the spatial discretization error caused by this cell size transition, i.e., the small amount of non-orthogonality in the perfectly orthogonal grid. I have come up with three ways.

1) Refining the mesh size of the entire fluid region rather than using near-wall refinement, but this method is expensive in computation.
2) Continue increasing the number of near-wall refinement layers, like a buffer layer, to achieve a lower mesh growth ratio at the interface between the coarse grid and the fine grid.
3) Refining the inlet boundary of the pipe to more accurately capture the entrance effect.*


I very much await your response!!!

Vikoel

April 13, 2024
vikoel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 22, 2024, 14:00
Default
  #2
New Member
 
drowinsk's Avatar
 
David Rowinski
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 10
drowinsk is on a distinguished road
Hello, and thank you for your question. In addition to your 3 solutions provided, you may also consider these two approaches (1) using the inlaid-mesh option to create a boundary layer mesh for your region of interest. In this way, you can directly control the aspect ratio and growth ratio of cells near the wall; and (2) triggering adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) based on the quantity of interest in the near wall region. If you found that your solution was sensitive to the mesh resolution at adjacent jumps in grid level, you can decrease your SGS criterion used for refinement to increase the sensitivity of the AMR controls.
__________________
David H. Rowinski, Ph.D.
Principal Engineer
Convergent Science, Inc.
Madison, WI, USA
david.rowinski@convergecfd.com
www.convergecfd.com
drowinsk is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Foam::error::PrintStack almir OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 91 December 21, 2022 04:50
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? mpeppels CFX 11 August 22, 2019 07:30
My radial inflow turbine Abo Anas CFX 27 May 11, 2018 01:44
Out File does not show Imbalance in % Mmaragann CFX 5 January 20, 2017 10:20
Multiphase flow - incorrect velocity on inlet Mike_Tom CFX 6 September 29, 2016 01:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:28.