|
[Sponsors] |
July 19, 2012, 02:46 |
Abuout turbulent viscosity
|
#1 |
New Member
Zhe Lu
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi everyone:
I'm calculating a case with an airfoil flying in ground effect. The height, h/c, is 0.01, and Re is about 2e7. Everything looks alright, except that the turbulent viscosity is over the default limit of 1e5 in some cells(red ones in the picture below). And there are no similar phenomena in other fields like turbulent kinetic energy, velocity, etc. So, anybody has any suggestions? Thanks in advance! |
|
July 19, 2012, 02:52 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46 |
I have some questions about your setup.
The tiny little spot at the bottom center of the image is the airfoil, right? What are the boundary conditions for your simulation and where are they applied? I am especially curious about the boundary condition for the "floor" and the inlet. Could you show the mesh you used in the same view as the contour plot of the turbulent viscosity ratio is taken? Last edited by flotus1; July 19, 2012 at 05:58. |
|
July 19, 2012, 07:21 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Zhe Lu
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 14 |
The little spot is the airfoil. Other than the airfoil, there are 4 boundaries: inlet, outlet, "floor" and "ceiling". I set the floor as a moving wall with the same velocity as the flow and set inlet as velocity inlet. The outlet is pressure outlet and the ceiling is symmetric. Plus, the turbulence model is realizable k-e with enhanced wall treatment. The picture I uploaded might be a little bit misleading, actually there is some distance between the inlet and the red cells, so here is a new one.
|
|
July 19, 2012, 07:22 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Zhe Lu
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 14 |
This thread doesn't make any sense, but I don't know how to delete it...
|
|
July 19, 2012, 07:41 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46 |
The boundary conditions are ok.
It seems like the viscosity ratio is high in cells with a high aspect ratio. Am I right assuming that the cells near the inlet have the same height as the cells in the boundary layer of the airfoil because of the block structure of the grid? I know this will result in a very high cell count, but try to obtain better aspect ratios in the cells near the inlet and the outlet with smaller cells in the streamwise direction. |
|
July 20, 2012, 04:17 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
Zhe Lu
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
reversed flow at pressure inlet and turbulent viscosity is limited.... | cfdiscool | FLUENT | 10 | June 10, 2015 06:15 |
Too low temperature at combustor outlet | romekr | FLUENT | 2 | February 6, 2012 10:02 |
Turbulent viscosity and shear rate | shib | FLUENT | 0 | June 22, 2010 12:44 |
setting value of turbulent intensity and turbulent viscosity ratio in wind tunnel | nuimlabib | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 4, 2009 00:05 |
Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited | David Yang | FLUENT | 3 | June 3, 2002 06:13 |