|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Porous Green Gauss Node vs Least Squares Cell |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Hi,
I had a tube filled with a high quality hex mesh. Flow enters with 860°C and walls have a constant temperature of 70°C. I run it once with the Least Squares Cell based gradient and once with the Green Gauss Node based one. I get at the outlet two different temperatures, 216 for Least Squares and 214 for Green Gauss. I think the result with Least Square Cell based is "correct" but I am not sure as I couldn't find an explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ensight - node values -cell values | leo | FLUENT | 1 | May 12, 2010 09:47 |
| element height or cell node | Staggered Grid Online | FLUENT | 0 | April 6, 2006 20:44 |
| Gauss theorem & cell volume | x_flow | Main CFD Forum | 7 | February 8, 2005 03:11 |
| node based or cell centered Ts values | acboge | FLUENT | 0 | February 6, 2004 07:41 |
| Node centered and cell centered. | Confused. | Main CFD Forum | 9 | August 29, 2003 14:54 |