CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

k-omega SST near-wall mesh

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 16, 2014, 07:56
Default k-omega SST near-wall mesh
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 5
spellkun is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

I'm doing calculations on an air inlet (a pipe, basically), the objective being the evaluation of the total pressure losses at a certain distance. I use the pressure-based solver, steady, k-omega SST for turbulence.

I have doubts concerning the mesh I should generate: I have noticed that Fluent doesn't offer the choice between wall-law/low-Re concerning the near-wall modeling, and I assumed that it picked the appropriate model, according to the Y+ of the near-wall layer.

This extract from the Fluent User's Guide seems to confirm my hypothesis:

"The wall boundary conditions for the k equation in the k-omega models are treated in the same way as the equation is treated when enhanced wall treatments are used with the k-epsilon models. This means that all boundary conditions for wall-function meshes will correspond to the wall function approach, while for the fine meshes, the appropriate low-Reynolds number boundary conditions will be applied."

In order to generate lighter meshes, I chose the wall-law approach, and I made sure that the Y+ was always between 30 and 200, as close as possible to 30.

My professor, however, just told me that the k-omega SST model is supposed to be used only with low-Re meshes, and that If I wanted to keep the cell count low, I had to switch to the k-epsilon or standard k-omega models.

I'd like to stick with the k-omega SST since it should combine the strengths of the k-epsilon and std k-omega models... could someone clarify the point concerning the meshes? Am I obliged to generate low Re grids if I want to use the K-omega SST model?


spellkun is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 17, 2014, 18:19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 126
Rep Power: 5
Kina is on a distinguished road
Not necessarily. The thing is that k-omega is good for near-wall modeling with a y+ of around 1 while k-epsilon is good for fully turbulent free stream flow. Thus, k-omega lacks accuracy when applied to fully turbulent farfield flow whereas k-epsilon models the near-wall region with wall functions.
The k-w SST model combines the advantages of both approaches as it includes a blending function (F1) that switches from k-w in the nearfield to k-e in the freestream flow. This is obviously also a function of the local y+ value. If you are using a y+ of 30 and the k-w SST model, you won't take advantage of the accurate boundary layer resolution of the k-w model as you would effectively only make use of the k-e model.
What I want to say is: If you are using the k-w SST model with a y+ of 30, you could also just use the realizable k-e with enhanced wall treatment as it wouldn't really make any difference.
Kina is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 18, 2014, 03:54
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 5
spellkun is on a distinguished road
I understand, thanks a lot!
spellkun is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2014, 11:15
Unhappy OMGA on the wall in SST
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lisboa
Posts: 83
Rep Power: 9
behest is on a distinguished road
Dear all,
I am working with Fluent and I have simulated a flat plate and the mesh is enough refine (Y+<=1). The turbulence model that I use is k-w SST and I uncheck Low-Reynolds-Number in the turbulence panel. My goal is to obtain the equation that Fluent uses for OMEGA value on the wall surface. Therefore, I compared the omega value on the plate surface obtained by Fluent and mine; but they are not the same and they are exactly different. I used this equation:

U_tau=friction velosity

It would be appriciated if you help me about the equation. How can I get the same OMGA value with Fluent?
behest is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to set periodic boundary conditions Ganesh FLUENT 13 January 22, 2014 05:11
Wall treatment mesh refinement in k-omega SST model Jorg FLUENT 0 February 27, 2013 12:32
[ICEM] Export ICEM mesh to Gambit / Fluent romekr ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 November 26, 2011 13:11
Convergence moving mesh lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 November 19, 2007 15:09
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:12.