CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Time Step sizing

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 27, 2014, 09:48
Default Time Step sizing
  #1
Senior Member
 
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13
visitor is on a distinguished road
Understand the sizing of time step, as per manuals. Typical Cell Size /characteristic velocity...

But if I was to simulate a flow condition over 48 hours, is it wrong to divide the 48 hours over for an example 10 steps. Time step = 48/10 (then convert to seconds).

This will give me a flow simulation over 24 hours.

Please let me know what you think

thanks
visitor is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2014, 09:56
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,965
Rep Power: 26
pakk will become famous soon enough
Are you asking a question? I don't know what you want from us...
pakk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2014, 01:15
Default To be or not to be, that is the question.. (Shakespear)
  #3
Senior Member
 
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13
visitor is on a distinguished road
Yes my friend I am asking a question. "Is it wrong to divide ... "

But let me refraze.

I am monitoring a solution in Fluent over 48 hours, heat transfer analysis.

I have selected 10 time steps, with each step size of 17,280 seconds.

Where 17,280 seconds = 4.8 hours. Will later then plot a graph of temperature against every time step (or every 17,280 seconds).

Is this the correct way in analyzing over 48 hours transient model?

eg
transient;
time step = 17,280s
No of time steps 10
Iterations 20 per a time step.
visitor is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2014, 02:07
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,965
Rep Power: 26
pakk will become famous soon enough
This could be a correct way.

It could be that 10 time steps is not sufficient and you need more, or that the 20 iterations per time step is not sufficient, but that really depends on your problem.
pakk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 29, 2014, 00:14
Default Experimenting
  #5
Senior Member
 
AH
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 13
visitor is on a distinguished road
Previous inputs did not work.

Got divergence at AMG ....

Now trying a different approach, will share the outcome, if it works.
Using PISO, PRESTO, .., Turbulence k-w sst..


Thanks.
visitor is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMI speed performance danny123 OpenFOAM 21 October 24, 2020 04:13
Extrusion with OpenFoam problem No. Iterations 0 Lord Kelvin OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 March 28, 2016 11:08
number of iterations per time step chouki FLUENT 1 August 13, 2013 00:11
Full pipe 3D using icoFoam cyberbrain OpenFOAM 4 March 16, 2011 09:20
calculation diverge after continue to run zhajingjing OpenFOAM 0 April 28, 2010 04:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24.