CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Turbulence model, time step for a solar reactor simulation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 12, 2016, 21:07
Default Turbulence model, time step for a solar reactor simulation
  #1
New Member
 
Krishna Sandeep Prata
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 3
KrishnaSandeep is on a distinguished road
Hello all,

I am simulating the fluid flow inside a solar reactor. The reactor has two inlets and two outlets. The inlets and outlets are circular pipes that open into vertical rectangular channels (please see the attached picture). I am not modeling the pipes and my domain starts/ends at the intersection of the circular pipe with the vertical channel. The computational domain contains a porous cylinder (As seen by the solid blue color) and non porous fluid domains too. The physical problem that I am solving can be described as follows. The entire reactor is initially filled with static air at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. At t>0, Nitrogen and CO2 flow into the reactor from their respective inlets, establish a fluid field and go through the outlets. So, as time progresses, initial air gets displaced. So, the steady state of the reactor (if exists) should not have air. Here are a few questions that I have -
Quote:
1) The Reynolds number based on the hydraulic diameter is ~2000 for one inlet and ~6000 for the other. So, ideally I should use a turbulence model for accuracy/convergence. But if you see the flow path after the inlets, they just travel through the rectangular channel bounded by two walls. So, the instabilities should be compensated by viscosity. After they pass through the rectangular channels, they enter a region where turbulence cannot create much fluid flow difference. I used three turbulence models - laminar, k-epsilon and Transition SST and I could identify qualitative differences with respect to the convergence of species equation. The error (outflow-inflow)/inflow is greatest for laminar (about 20%), followed by k-epsilon (about 10%) and then followed by SST (About 6%). So, should I keep using SST? I do not require any analysis with respect to separation/transition.

2) I used a steady state simulation but could not reach desired accuracy with respect to the species balance. So, I am now switching to transient case. How should I decide the over the time step and the maximum number of iterations per time step?

Any help in this regard is highly appreciated. I know I have not provided many details but I will post details as you ask.

Thanks.
KrishnaSandeep is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2016, 21:18
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Krishna Sandeep Prata
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 3
KrishnaSandeep is on a distinguished road
Sorry for the image mixup. I am attaching the image here.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg converged_case4 3_with_gravity.jpg (119.5 KB, 2 views)
KrishnaSandeep is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
mesh, species accuracy, time stepping, turbulence

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Extrusion with OpenFoam problem No. Iterations 0 Lord Kelvin OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 March 28, 2016 11:08
same geometry,structured and unstructured mesh,different behaviour. sharonyue OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 13 January 2, 2013 23:40
pisoFoam with k-epsilon turb blows up - Some questions Heroic OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 26 December 17, 2012 04:34
AMI speed performance danny123 OpenFOAM 19 October 24, 2012 07:44
IcoFoam parallel woes msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 02:58


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:11.