|
[Sponsors] |
September 17, 2016, 15:08 |
MRF or SRF??
|
#1 |
New Member
Dinesh
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: India
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 16 |
Dear friends,
I am solving a problem which has a shaft ( rotating), fluid (which is rotating due to shaft motion) and a bearing (stationary). The problem is similar to journal bearing simulation. The lower layer of the fluid is attached to shaft surface and upper layer is attached to bearing surface. How to solve this problem? Do i need to use multiple reference frame or sliding reference frame? how to define these motions? The problem is in 3 dimension. Kindly help. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MRF and topoSet problem- Rotating volume doesn't rotate | andreas0209@hotmail.com | OpenFOAM | 1 | April 4, 2021 13:35 |
velocity inlet in SRF like "U" file in MRF | Ananthakrishnan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | March 31, 2016 05:12 |
MRF setup | andreas0209@hotmail.com | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 1 | August 6, 2015 09:36 |
Single Reference Frame (SRF) or Multiple Reference Frame (MRF) | aminem | FLUENT | 2 | June 18, 2014 16:41 |
rotatingWallVelocity vs. SRF vs. MRF vs. AMI/GGI | Soheyl | OpenFOAM | 3 | September 12, 2012 14:19 |