CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Validation of 2D CFD model with 3D wind tunnel Data

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 11, 2020, 13:14
Default Validation of 2D CFD model with 3D wind tunnel Data
New Member
Saugat Shrestha
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Thailand
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 6
saugatshr4 is on a distinguished road
I completed a 2D bluff body turbulent model in Ansys Fluent. I am getting a satisfactory drag coefficient and Strouhal's number. However, when I am trying to validate my results with the 3D wind tunnel data for the fluctuating drag and lift, I have a problem. The 2D wind tunnel data is comparatively very high for the RMS and the peak.
So, my question is,
Can we validate 2D CFD data with 3D wind tunnel data? Or we have to make a 3D model for the comparison?
I hope you can help in this regard. Thank You in advance.
With best regards,
saugatshr4 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 11, 2020, 17:13
Default 2D Planar
Senior Member
vinerm's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
You mentioned that the drag coefficient and Strouhal number are satisfactory. Since you also mention that the drag and lift are not matching with the wind tunnel data, could you explain in what sense are they satisfactory; are those values stable and numerically converged or are those matching with some other results?

You can compare 2D with 3D provided the assumptions in the 2D are valid for the 3D model it represents. A 3D model is 3D if it has three-dimensional effects taken into account. E.g., when airfoil profiles are tested in a wind-tunnel then their width is kept rather large as compared to chord length to avoid 3D effects. However, if the wind tunnel data are for 3D, then the results should match only for the boundaries normal to the axes involved in the simulation and not for the whole model. Even for the normal boundaries results would match if the variation across the third dimension is insignificant, which it never is if the wind tunnel model is 3D in the sense explained above.

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote


2d model, ansys fluent, data validation, wind tunnel simulation

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[General] Extracting ParaView Data into Python Arrays Jeffzda ParaView 30 November 6, 2023 22:00
[OpenFOAM] How to get the coordinates of velocity data at all cells and at all times vidyadhar ParaView 9 May 20, 2020 21:06
CFD model validation with experimental data Alsumri ANSYS 6 November 14, 2019 12:14
Validation Data for Hyperloop/Evacutated Tube/Train in Tunnel spggodd Main CFD Forum 5 November 3, 2017 09:48
CFD v.s wind tunnel in airfoil FRED CHEN CFX 0 July 12, 2005 03:59

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26.