|
[Sponsors] |
appripriate Y+ and meshing don't seem compatible |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 28, 2022, 04:28 |
appripriate Y+ and meshing don't seem compatible
|
#1 |
New Member
Lee
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi, newbie here. please forgive my ignorance.
I'm trying to model an airway. Below is my conditions: standard k-epsilon velocity-inlet and pressure-outlet no slip standard wall function I made a hybrid mesh with prism layer near wall and tetrahedral in the center. From it, I get reasonable result. yet the y+ value was around 1. I was told that I should have y+ value near 100 for k-e. to increase y+, i need to increase the initial height of prism layer near wall. But this leads to intuitively wrong mesh. What am I doing wrong here and what should i do? Why can't i just have y+ around 1? reasonable mesh: https://imgur.com/gallery/UlHaD0u reasonable result: https://imgur.com/gallery/yvR3m3Q increased initial height: https://imgur.com/a/SK5FppL |
|
May 29, 2022, 09:52 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,675
Rep Power: 66 |
You can have a wall y+ of around 1 and it is preferred.
You should ask the ghost that told you 100 why 100. |
|
June 6, 2022, 05:13 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Lee
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
thank you for your reply.
When I asked the guy who told me that y+ should be around 100, he just told me that it was from a user guide. I read the user guide, which i couldn't find that. I did saw that y+ should be above 30 ~ 300when using wall function. So i think that's what he meant by. But i decided to just lower the y+ below 1 and to directly solve the boundary layer. Thank you for your help! |
|
June 6, 2022, 08:03 |
|
#4 |
New Member
I do CFD
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 4 |
it depends on your turbulence model and wall functions, in some wall functions y+ should not fall in the logartimic boundary lyer zone
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ANSYS Meshing] only automatic meshing works, | kazra | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | February 23, 2017 11:38 |
[ICEM] Flow channel meshing problems | StefanG | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 19 | May 15, 2012 06:44 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Meshing strategy for External Flows | Hybrid | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | January 24, 2012 14:27 |
Best Meshing scheme for Cylinder | Nutrex | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 29, 2008 11:03 |
Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid | ken | FLUENT | 0 | September 4, 2003 11:08 |