CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

No combustion using Finite Rate

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By maziar77

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 26, 2016, 06:08
Default No combustion using Finite Rate
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
VictorC is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

I am modeling a methane gas burner. I managed to get the cold flow running with no issues, but when I try to add combustion there is no reaction. Because of this I decided to do a very simple model to try to get combustion running on that one before doing it in my main model.

For the simple model I have a very simple geometry. It is essentially cylinder with three equal diameter sections. My aim to the start the combustion on the second section of the cylinder.

My setup is as follows:
  • Species Transport Model with Finite-Rate Chemistry
  • Mixture Material: Methane-Air
  • Inlet: T=300K; mole fractions of CH4=0.0872, O2=0.1918, N2=0.721

What I have done so far:
  • Running the cold flow until it converges
  • To initiate reaction patching the mid-section of the cylinder with T=2000K and reactants+products.

My problem is that no reaction occurs, the solution is the same as the one with cold flow (no temperature increase, no combustion species present). However if I change the inlet temperature to 1500K the reaction starts from the inlet. This makes me guess that my setup is working, but for some reason the patching is not. What am I doing wrong? Why the reaction is not starting by patching the mid-section of the cylinder?

Any help will be greatly appreciated! Many thanks!
Victor

VictorC is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 27, 2016, 10:51
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Andrea
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 16
Andrea1984 is on a distinguished road
Hi Victor,

are you trying to simulate a counterflow flame here? If yes make sure that the strain rate is not too high otherwise the flame will be estinguished. It would probably be easier to simulate a simple swirl or bluff-body burner in order for the flame to be stable.

If your case is turbulent I would recommend you to follow the following steps (I am assuming that you are using the species transport model):
- run a cold flow simulation
- patch high temperature and product species within the domain (close to where you expect the flame to be ignited)
-select the Eddy Dissipation model and solve it (the combustion should be ignited now)
-switch to Finite Rate/Eddy Dissipation model if necessary

Hope this is helpful
Andrea
Andrea1984 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2022, 14:19
Default
  #3
New Member
 
maziar gheshlaghi
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Iran
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 4
maziar77 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrea1984 View Post
Hi Victor,

are you trying to simulate a counterflow flame here? If yes make sure that the strain rate is not too high otherwise the flame will be estinguished. It would probably be easier to simulate a simple swirl or bluff-body burner in order for the flame to be stable.

If your case is turbulent I would recommend you to follow the following steps (I am assuming that you are using the species transport model):
- run a cold flow simulation
- patch high temperature and product species within the domain (close to where you expect the flame to be ignited)
-select the Eddy Dissipation model and solve it (the combustion should be ignited now)
-switch to Finite Rate/Eddy Dissipation model if necessary

Hope this is helpful
Andrea
I have similar problem. i use species transport model with detailed GRI mechanism but I get no combustion with eddy dissipation model. i also patch temperature and products.
dats likes this.
maziar77 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modelling Combustion in Porous Zone tanjinjack FLUENT 2 September 26, 2016 04:10
Finite Rate doesnt burn, while Eddy Dissipation does. frankven2ra FLUENT 0 July 24, 2016 03:58
finite rate mutistep combustion torn Main CFD Forum 2 April 24, 2015 23:19
Coal Combustion - Devolatilization Rate Unit Amanda FLUENT 3 July 18, 2007 12:55
Premixed combustion -Laminar finite rate model Shankar FLUENT 4 March 17, 2004 15:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21.