CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Source term for UDS - Contaminant dispersion

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 31, 2023, 06:48
Question Source term for UDS - Contaminant dispersion
  #1
New Member
 
Rahul Jayakumar
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: India
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
rahul_jayakumar is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I would like to model contaminant dispersion in air in a rectangular domain using the passive scalar approach in Fluent. For this I am using a user-defined scalar(UDS). The flow field of air in the domain is already converged. I would like to inject a contaminant like ethylene with a different density than air.

The contaminant is being injected into the domain at a specified mass flow rate (say A kg/s) and mass fraction of 1 through a small hole on the bottom wall. I have also modeled the flow field through this inlet using the mass-flow-inlet bc. For the UDS, the inlet boundary is set to have a constant value of 1 corresponding to the mass fraction of contaminant. Whereas the air inlet,outlet and walls are given with specified flux of 0. The material diffusivity takes into account both laminar and turbulent diffusivity, based on the turbulent viscosity and Schmidt no of 0.7. The objective is to analyse the spread of the contaminant similar to a tracer injection.

My current problem is that I am not able to model the contaminant transport through the domain. After going through several forum discussions(on cfd-online and ansys forums) and literature for similar problems, I had implemented a source term for the UDS equation equal to the density of the fluid. Since most of these discussions were about computing the age of air(in air) this source was set to density of air. But since the density of the contaminant is different, should the source term be modified to the mixture density using the species?

Also, when the contaminant is injected at a specified mass flow rate, is it right to model the flow though the inlet while computing the flow field and using a constant value of concentration at the inlet or should the mass flow rate be incorporated into the concentration value at inlet itself?

Thanks.
rahul_jayakumar is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
contaminant, fluent, passive scalar, tracer injection, uds source


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[openSmoke] LaminarSMOKE compilation error mdhfiz OpenFOAM Community Contributions 7 October 4, 2022 13:57
[Other] Tabulated thermophysicalProperties library chriss85 OpenFOAM Community Contributions 62 October 2, 2022 03:50
Source term for EVAPORATION in Energy Equ. - technical difficulty ? Kummi OpenFOAM 1 September 9, 2019 09:32
polynomial BC srv537 OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 4 December 3, 2016 09:07
DxFoam reader update hjasak OpenFOAM Post-Processing 69 April 24, 2008 01:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01.