CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Periodic Baffle Minor Loss: models, wall treatment, convergence

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 19, 2024, 14:45
Default Periodic Baffle Minor Loss: models, wall treatment, convergence
  #1
New Member
 
Andrew
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
lifelong_learner is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am interested in determining the minor loss associated with steady flow through a channel around alternating baffles for different baffle lengths and spacing (ideally within 2-3 significant figures). Using ANSYS Fluent 2021 R2, I have set up a periodic inlet/outlet condition targeting a specific flow rate, such that Re > 2e3 (based on hydraulic diameter).

My primary concerns are: (1) which viscous model is best suited for the flow described (2) whether I have the correct near-wall treatment (3) how to know if my results are sufficiently converged (4) if there is a preferred solver for the given model and flow conditions.

I was thinking to use realizable k-epsilon or k-omega SST, but I was wondering if anyone had an intuitive sense of which model would be best suited to this flow.

In the event that I use a k-epsilon model, I was also wondering whether standard wall functions or enhance wall treatment is more suitable. I am thinking that I do not need to resolve the viscous sub-layer, since my interest is more in the overall periodic pressure drop across the inlet/outlet, so I was thinking to use standard wall functions. However, I don't really know how the bulk flow condition and measured pressure drop might depend on the wall treatment.

From simulations that I have run with realizable k-epsilon and standard wall treatment, the solution seems to converge rapidly, with scaled residuals below 1e-6 for the shorter baffle lengths (fixed spacing). However, for longer baffles I can only get scaled residuals below 1e-3 (largest residual representing continuity). In both cases, a monitor of average wall shear and inlet pressure do reach steady values. Nevertheless, I am uncertain as to whether the reported pressure drop in these cases can be trusted. There are some values in the literature as well as experimental values that I can compare against, but only for a select range of geometries. I tend not to think of this as a meshing issue, since it is a fairly simple geometry, I was able to obtain good mesh quality for all hex elements within the recommended y+ for the standard wall functions.

In any case, I appreciate any insights on the above points. To illustrate the flow geometry, I attaching an illustration of the flow domain. Thanks for the help, and let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
Andrew
Attached Images
File Type: jpg flow domain.JPG (13.3 KB, 1 views)
lifelong_learner is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
periodic, viscous models, wall treatment


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ansys CFD-Post Application Error rushiCFD FLUENT 0 March 21, 2021 07:51
Wall boundary conditions for the automatic wall treatment function for K-omega models TCosta CONVERGE 3 May 25, 2017 10:29
Turbulence Near wall Treatment: can standard treatment be used for y+ between 1 to 5? mohibanwar FLUENT 9 August 30, 2015 01:11
On the LES near wall treatment huangxianbei FLUENT 8 August 27, 2014 11:13
Error finding variable "THERMX" sunilpatil CFX 8 April 26, 2013 07:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06.