X-Y plot of Yplus in Fluent 5.3

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 30, 2000, 13:43 Re: X-Y plot of Yplus in Fluent 5.3 #21 Jonas Larsson Guest   Posts: n/a You should check your eddy-viscosity field to see if it looks physical. On low-Re flows (some types of rotating cavities) we've had problems with discontinuities in the eddy-viscosity when using the Realizable k-epsilon - see my post below entitled "Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable k-epsilon Model" for further details.

 March 31, 2000, 07:52 Re: X-Y plot of Yplus in Fluent 5.3 #22 Volker Pawlik Guest   Posts: n/a 1. Your explanations were very helpful. 2. What I still find confusing is the use of u* in the Fluent User's Guide as s.th. different from u-tau. It is because, as far as I know, u* has already been introduced as a synonym for u-tau (i.e. the same, e.g Tennekes, A first course in Turbulence, p.53). Am I right?

 March 31, 2000, 09:32 Re: X-Y plot of Yplus in Fluent 5.3 #23 Jonas Larsson Guest   Posts: n/a Tennekes & Lumley's definiton of u* is not the same as Fluent's (see Sung-Eun's post). Fluent's definition of u* does not involve the wall shear-stress - it is a pure turbulent velocity scale independent of wall-properties. Fluent calls T&L's u* for u_tau, the real name is "friction velocity". It's confusing, I agree.

 March 31, 2000, 15:08 Re: X-Y plot of Yplus in Fluent 5.3 #24 Sung-Eun Kim Guest   Posts: n/a I'm afraid that I don't have a straightforward concise answer to your question. Please bear with me if things get too wordy. The Wolfstein's one-equation is a wall-distance based, "near-wall", low-Re model, inasmuch as it is based on Re_y as turbulence parameter where y is the distance to the wall. It's a great, practical turbulence model that I've frequently seen beats up most of the contemporary two-equation low-Re models, in terms of accuracy, let alone robustnerss. But it would be least ideal to represent the low-Re effects, say, in a pocket of transitional flows far from the wall, where Re_y may be big enough (the model then reduces to a high-Re model) , but the flow is in reality transitional. In those regions, Re_t (k*k/epsilon), which is a more relevant turbulent Reynolds number, is not necessarily large enough. If Re_y is smaller than 200 in most of your domain including the region where the mixing happens vigorously, it's not an ideal situation for the two-layer model either because you're then using effectively one-equation model that doesn't account for the transport of one of the important turbulent quantities (epsilon) in the flow where non-equilibrium effects are presumably significant. So, If I am to follow the common wisdom alluded to above, I'll tend toward one of the low-Re models FLUENT offers underhand. But I have no hard evidence to support the recommendation.

 April 11, 2000, 06:07 Re: X-Y plot of Yplus in Fluent 5.3 #25 Volker Pawlik Guest   Posts: n/a And what about the RNG-differential viscosity model which should form my point of view also address the problem?

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post baechtel FLUENT 1 May 1, 2009 04:51 Jane FLUENT 0 November 19, 2008 21:30 jrg FLUENT 3 November 12, 2007 05:48 sandra FLUENT 1 August 28, 2006 06:59 david smith FLUENT 0 October 26, 2000 17:54

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:56.