CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Temperature Patch Problem

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 10, 2000, 12:05
Default Temperature Patch Problem
Prateep Chatterjee
Posts: n/a
Hello !

I am simulating a laminar flame in a Rijke tube with a honeycomb structure over which the flame is supposed to reside. I used a 3000 K temperature patch just in front of the honeycomb. The case is adiabatic so the flame actually flashes back into the honeycomb. The problem lies with the temperature patch: I'm unable to get rid of it easily. The under-relaxation I can go upto without making the solution go haywire is 0.3 for energy. For the species I'm using a 0.9 relaxation. The species profiles develop pretty fast but the temperature patch refuses to dissapear. I'm using 4 processors in an SGI Origin machines and it has already taken me 10000 iterations to bring the max temp in the system down to 2400 K. The patch seems to be moving downstream but at a very slow rate. I have a 2000 K patch after the 3000 K patch downstream till the exit.

Can I get any suggestions as to what I can do ?


  Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2000, 06:04
Default Re: Temperature Patch Problem
Volker Pawlik
Posts: n/a
That looks quite similar to my problem and question. Did you had a look to the 'laminar combustion" question which can be found in the 'archive of old contributions".

Advises were:1. Using the coupled solver, start with a coarse grid...

I also had problems in getting the temperature low. It always hit the upper limit. I think it has to do with the kinetic constants. Are your kinetic coefficients suitable for a laminar problem. I think the build in coeff. of Fluent are not. They seem to be valid only in turbulent cases where the reaction rate is calculated based on the mean temperature values. This would lead to rates which are too low (factors of about 1e4). Therefore the coeff. are adapted to be suitable for turbulent conditions, i.e. to give high reaction rates which may lead to high temperatures in a laminar case. This is still a supposition of mine, since I yet did not arrive in comparing coeff. from literature (e.g of Westbrook and dryer) which are expresed in kmol with the ones in Fluent (expressed in kg).

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Commercial meshers] Fluent3DMeshToFoam simvun OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 50 January 19, 2020 15:33
Temperature Vapor Patch shashank312 FLUENT 0 April 14, 2011 17:04
[Gmsh] Import problem ARC OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 February 27, 2010 10:56
CheckMeshbs errors ivanyao OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 March 11, 2009 02:34

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:32.