|
[Sponsors] |
March 30, 2004, 23:52 |
gambit problem
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi all,
if there are several Volumes, and i have to create mesh for them respectively, can i unite them after creating mesh? another question: what's difference from uniting several volumes and not uniting them? thank you! best regards! benny |
|
March 31, 2004, 01:50 |
Re: gambit problem
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Benny
You must have to unite all the geometry before creating mesh. If you don't unite the volumes then each volume will be consider as separate domain/zone. So the flow field will not be the continuous. For example two separate containers placed together with two fluid and they are not mixing.......they are separated by rigid walls. any other question? feel free to ask. Alamgir |
|
March 31, 2004, 10:53 |
Re: gambit problem
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi!
You can also mesh the volumes separatelly (what you allready did) and then separatelly define the bc on the face pairs where the two volumes unite. Each face has to be separetelly defined as wall! You can then define the face pair in fluent as periodic interface. good luck MATEUS |
|
April 2, 2004, 00:53 |
Re: gambit problem
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
what is the difference between periodic interface and coupled interface?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gambit geometry problem | cestrin | FLUENT | 3 | July 4, 2012 02:33 |
[Commercial meshers] Problem with Mesh conversion Gambit msh Foam | Rachid BANNARI (Bannari) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 25 | September 11, 2011 07:58 |
Gambit installation problem | Panos | FLUENT | 4 | March 5, 2009 22:44 |
Problem meshing with Gambit | Adrian | FLUENT | 8 | October 7, 2008 08:39 |
Startup Problem in Gambit 2.2 with WindowXP | Win Win Maw | FLUENT | 3 | January 25, 2006 11:09 |