|
[Sponsors] |
April 17, 2005, 07:32 |
SUPERSONIC JET VISCOSITY
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi All,
I had a quick question... To get extremely accurate flow results would you neglect viscosity of a high Mach number(Ma=9) jet impinging on a flat plate? I realize the inertial term would be a lot greater than the viscous term, but I thought near the flat plate the viscosity term might be quite important. Can someone please help me with my dilemma? Thank you. Regards, Manish |
|
April 19, 2005, 13:29 |
Re: SUPERSONIC JET VISCOSITY
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
At such high speeds you can usually neglect the viscous terms since the intertia term dominates. The boundary layer is pretty small for high speed flows . ( you can see this by non dimensionalising the N-S eqn and viscous terms have an order (1/Re).So you can neglect the viscous terms and still get accurate results.
-H |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
C-D nozzle supersonic jet boundary | Gland | FLUENT | 4 | May 24, 2012 00:25 |
Liquid Jet into Supersonic Flow | Alex | CFX | 4 | June 20, 2007 10:56 |
Supersonic Jet Flows | Danny Tan | FLUENT | 0 | November 30, 2001 21:01 |
jet structure at the end of a 2D supersonic nozzle | N Menon | CFX | 1 | November 7, 2001 08:04 |
Turbulence model for supersonic jet | Danny Tandra | Main CFD Forum | 3 | August 24, 2001 04:10 |