|
[Sponsors] |
June 30, 2005, 18:23 |
Multiple rotating frame VS dynamic mesh
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am modeling a domain, part of it is rotating (a ball), and part of it is stationary (a chamber). Should I use multiple rotating frame or dynamic mesh? Thanks
|
|
June 30, 2005, 23:55 |
Re: Multiple rotating frame VS dynamic mesh
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
this is pretty interesting case, with MRF, for spheres i ahve observed that fluent calculates negative lift coefficient(i ahev done more than 10 different cases with it). its better to use dynamic or moving mesh with it. at least the sign of the lift is okey.
|
|
July 1, 2005, 10:58 |
Re: Multiple rotating frame VS dynamic mesh
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Really? They yield different results? But the latter seems more difficult
|
|
July 2, 2005, 07:31 |
Re: Multiple rotating frame VS dynamic mesh
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yes, but we are not able to find the solution to this problem, fluent support also is answerless, fianlly we are only using sliding mesh approach which is easy to use (if does not give u negatve volumes or handedness prob)
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to set periodic boundary conditions | Ganesh | FLUENT | 15 | November 18, 2020 07:09 |
Dynamic mesh update problem. | David | FLUENT | 3 | March 15, 2012 06:02 |
Best choice for my setup ? Sliding mesh or single rotating ref frame ? | Rockda | FLUENT | 0 | August 23, 2011 06:05 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |
Dynamic Mesh: Rotating a box? | Brian | FLUENT | 1 | February 20, 2006 18:27 |