CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Aero study for symmetry case

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Jason

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 27, 2005, 05:34
Default Aero study for symmetry case
Posts: n/a
I am trying to run a simulation for a 3d symmetry case. The questions are:

1. Can I simulate only half the model (symmetry) in Fluent?

2. For the coefficient, such as Cd and Cl, do I need to time by 2 the simulated Cd and Cl for the real value?

3. Do I need to use the Size Function to control my mesh size?

Thank you.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 27, 2005, 08:43
Default Re: Aero study for symmetry case
Posts: n/a
1) Yes, just use the symmetry b.c. on your symmetry plane. Remember, if you've got separated regions along the symmetry plane, you'll get more of a time averaged solution due to the symmetry plane cutting the separated region in half.

2) Well, a common way of dealing with this is to only use half the reference area (since you only have half of your model) that way the coefficients are correct for the full model. If you're looking at forces directly (in Newtons or Lbs, or whatever units you're in) then you will be only seeing half of the force (once again, because you only have half the model). Fluent doesn't assume anything special when you apply a Symmetry B.C. It's only a way of dealing with one of the surfaces on your volume mesh.

3) Depends on your meshing. If you're using structured mesh (or if you're using the cooper meshing scheme for volumes), it's easy to control the volume mesh by meshing edges, then faces, then volumes (and uses less memory). If you're using a tet mesh, then the easiest way to mesh a volume is using sizing functions. The other option is to decompose the C.V. into smaller volumes. These volumes would have to be small enough so that the mesh size is about constant through the volume. In a 3D tet mesh, Gambit tries to apply whatever element size you have specified. If there isn't a lot of variation in mesh size on on that volume then this isn't a big problem, but if you have a refined area, then the growth rate off of this refined area tends to be too large.

Hope this helps, and good luck, Jason
mehdiii likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 28, 2005, 01:38
Default Re: Aero study for symmetry case
Posts: n/a
Well Jason, thank so much for your help. It really help me a lot.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Numerical error or case error? Flow in a 3D pipe fsalvucci OpenFOAM 40 January 30, 2013 08:10
Flux update during an MPI run between decomposed case parts? scott OpenFOAM 0 July 21, 2010 20:47
uptodate water distribution network fredius,magige,tanzanian,(e.a) Main CFD Forum 0 January 27, 2002 08:10
To verify case study ruengsak panyasen Main CFD Forum 1 July 15, 2001 15:44
Transonic Test Case Scott Holloway Main CFD Forum 2 October 31, 2000 14:35

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:03.