|
[Sponsors] |
March 8, 2006, 04:27 |
BC for a wind tunnel
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi all
I'd like to simulate a typical problem: a car in a wind tunnel, to get correlation with real tests. I've read many articles that say the BC type to apply for the top and external side walls is the symmetry one. But why??? In a real wind tunnel, the top and side walls are not moving and they (unfortunately) interfere with the tested model: the properties of symmetry BC (all gradients = 0, I guess) are thus not always verified. Shouldn't be more appropriate to simply use stationnary walls? Please give me your ideas. regards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
flow in cyclic wind tunnel | yogesh@cfd | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 8, 2010 04:28 |
wind tunnel results vs fluent | pixie | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 20, 2009 08:02 |
how to consider perforated wind tunnel wall in CFD simulation | littlelz | CFX | 4 | June 11, 2009 05:51 |
Virtual Wind Tunnel in FLUENT | ND | FLUENT | 0 | April 7, 2006 07:43 |
Wind Tunnel Website now online | Mike Worthey | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 6, 2000 02:27 |