|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
We are adding a Fluent capability to our existing CFX capability. We are interested in third party post processors. Any recommendations?
Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ah Ensight ... I have used it for other applications.
Does it support fluent output files natively or do you need to license appropriate import filters? Thanks for the suggestion. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have wondered if ParaView would accept fluent output. I've never tried though.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Fluent exports to Ensight format without any trouble, and this is readable (obviously) by both Ensight and Paraview. Paraview visualisation works very well, but its shortcoming is that it is far from easy to get quantitative output, such as a table of a temperature or velocity profile.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You may try CFX-Post in order to look at Fluent results.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Common post apps are FieldView, Ensight Gold, TecPlot, CFX Post,
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Much obliged.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NO model vs post processing in coal combustion,CFX | sakalido | CFX | 1 | April 15, 2011 15:07 |
Export from post gives different result between v11 and v12 | bennn | CFX | 2 | February 10, 2011 06:38 |
post processing for KIVA | dirga | Main CFD Forum | 5 | April 23, 2009 11:58 |
post data | starcd_learner | Siemens | 0 | February 1, 2006 12:24 |
Post Processing in FEM | Abhijit Tilak | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 26, 2004 12:59 |