CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Diffference between mass weighted average and Area

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree4Likes
  • 1 Post By giogio
  • 3 Post By Glenn

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 3, 2008, 04:00
Default Diffference between mass weighted average and Area
  #1
giogio
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, I don't understand the difference between Mass weighted average and area weighted average, when i must use one or the other. (results are very different).

Thanks
adnanghreeb likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2008, 12:19
Default Re: Diffference between mass weighted average and
  #2
Glenn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mass averaging is summation of (value * mass flow) / summation of mass flow over the surface of interest. Area averaging is summation of (value * area) / summation of area over the surface of interest.
elham-u, adnanghreeb and bhwcs like this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 24, 2012, 13:13
Thumbs down regarding mass weighted average velocity
  #3
New Member
 
abhi
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 12
ashgun is on a distinguished road
Hi,
i just want to know that is average velocity( mass weighted ) dependent on grid number ? Actually i am simulating flow through pipe , and flow is laminar so friction factor theoretical is 64/ Re . And flow is fully developed(done using C coding) .for Re 500 f th is 0.128. and i am getting 0.145 and its not acceptable i guess. U max is 0.01817. So actual avg. velocity value should be 0.01284813 but fluent giving me d value 0.012135. Can anyone tell me whats going wrong or how to improve avg. velocity value (mass weighted )

Since flow is laminar we cant get actual pressure drop(static) and its coming out 0.2396 and fluent giving me 0.24 so its close only problem is with velocity plz. tell what is wrong
ashgun is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 24, 2012, 16:42
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Ehsan Asgari
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 471
Rep Power: 16
syavash is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashgun View Post
Hi,
i just want to know that is average velocity( mass weighted ) dependent on grid number ? Actually i am simulating flow through pipe , and flow is laminar so friction factor theoretical is 64/ Re . And flow is fully developed(done using C coding) .for Re 500 f th is 0.128. and i am getting 0.145 and its not acceptable i guess. U max is 0.01817. So actual avg. velocity value should be 0.01284813 but fluent giving me d value 0.012135. Can anyone tell me whats going wrong or how to improve avg. velocity value (mass weighted )

Since flow is laminar we cant get actual pressure drop(static) and its coming out 0.2396 and fluent giving me 0.24 so its close only problem is with velocity plz. tell what is wrong
I guess nothing! Fluent solves the fluid flow numerically, so it's obvious that there would be difference in comparison with analytical solution.When dealing with computational methods, you have to consider range of acceptable numerical error, for instance 5%. Here you may try to adjust your mesh in order to get desired solution.
syavash is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 25, 2012, 01:36
Default
  #5
New Member
 
abhi
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 12
ashgun is on a distinguished road
I tried with 0.1 million cell count and 0.6 million, only i could see decrease in pressure drop but average velocity remained same
ashgun is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2018, 05:37
Default
  #6
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 6
Saman95 is on a distinguished road
I have a question about calculating area weighted average

how to calculating it for a variable?
Saman95 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2018, 11:06
Default
  #7
Far
Super Moderator
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,552
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Just go to surface integral. Choose the area weighted and choose your variable from list.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2018, 12:58
Default
  #8
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 6
Saman95 is on a distinguished road
yes I know,just by some simple click I can get Area weighted average.
you are cool

my mean is "Calculating with udf"
Saman95 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2018, 17:10
Default
  #9
Far
Super Moderator
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,552
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saman95 View Post
I have a question about calculating area weighted average

how to calculating it for a variable?
Quote:
my mean is "Calculating with udf"
How I can get that you meant UDF?

Any how you can look for those functions and write a udf. Refer to udf manual for samples.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 6, 2018, 08:24
Default
  #10
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 6
Saman95 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Far View Post
How I can get that you meant UDF?

Any how you can look for those functions and write a udf. Refer to udf manual for samples.
u are very clever
Saman95 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Area weighted or mass weighted average SAM Main CFD Forum 31 April 30, 2018 04:12
mass & area average henry CFX 8 September 30, 2016 03:26
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 03:32
mass weighted or area weighted wilson FLUENT 1 August 9, 2006 10:34
area weighted average Sireesha Pasari FLUENT 1 April 4, 2004 13:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:38.