|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Porous Formulation in Aerodynamic computation |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
I'm doing the computation of the aerodynamics around an aeroplane, I use the segragated solver and I have to choose the porous formulation, physical or superficial, but in my simulation there is no porous zone, so why do Fluent ask me this option? Which one could be the better choice? Thanks in advance F.B. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
porous formulation is only used if you have porous media. If no fluid regions are defined as porous then it doesn't matter which one it is set to and you can ignore.
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| drag coefficient computation on a porous jump??? | Fabrice | FLUENT | 4 | June 5, 2017 06:30 |
| VOF formulation | mvee | FLUENT | 3 | March 12, 2007 07:35 |
| Ale formulation | Eduardo Guennam | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 1, 2006 02:32 |
| physical velocity formulation and porous media | KLG | FLUENT | 2 | June 10, 2003 11:14 |
| porous body formulation | K. Natesan | Siemens | 0 | November 22, 2002 04:29 |