CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 22, 2011, 01:50
Default 2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX)
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,553
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far

It is stated in the CFX theory (above link) that when one selects the high resolution scheme as below


\nabla\phi\ is the value at the upwind node.

On the other hand when user selects the specified blend factor for \beta (between 0 and 1), \nabla\phi\ is equal to the average of the adjacent nodal gradients. I wanna know, this scheme is the upwind or central differencing scheme?

Where as in fluent user guide (above link) 2nd order upwind scheme is given by following formula


\nabla\phi\ is the gradient of \phi\ in the upwind cell

Both high resolution (CFX) and 2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent) are based on the principles by Barth and Jespersen [1] so that no new extrema is introduced in the solution, therfore monotonic behavior is preserved.

1. Does it mean that the high resolution scheme of CFX and 2nd order upwind scheme of fluent are equivalent.

2. Does it mean that the CFX 2nd order scheme is more like a baised 2nd order scheme with one term of upwind and 2nd term (anti diffusive term) is central differencing type?

3. Will 2nd order upwind (CFX definition) will make the solution worst than even 1st order upwind scheme?

Barth and Jespersen "The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes" .
Technical Report AIAA-89-0366, AIAA 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 1989.

Far is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparison of fluent and CFX for turbomachinery Far CFX 52 December 26, 2014 18:11
Second order upwind is not UPwind!!! Far CFX 9 May 31, 2011 08:21
CFX or Fluent for Turbo machinery ? Far FLUENT 3 May 27, 2011 03:02
High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) gravis ANSYS 3 March 24, 2011 02:43
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure Omer CFX 9 June 28, 2007 04:13

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32.