|
[Sponsors] |
August 28, 2014, 08:12 |
Intel I7 4930k vs. Amd Opteron 6344
|
#1 |
New Member
Burak Kaya
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi,
Has anyone had the chance to compare the two, Intel I7 4930k vs. Amd Opteron 6344 in terms of Fluent performance? Thanks. |
|
December 2, 2014, 23:30 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
B_Kia
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ir
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 11 |
hi Ferroburak
based on my experience intel cpus is better for CFD ( i work with Fluent ) , i have 2 systems First, AMD FX 8350 , ASUS M5A 99FX Pro R2.0 , 3*4 gig Ram 1866 2nd, intel i7 4770 , ASUS Z87K , 2*8 gig Ram 1600 i say intel is better and faster , and at highest pressure (using 8 cores) intel has very much lower temperature , for AMD temperature will go more than 70C but for intel it stays belower than 55C , So i had to buy a cpu cooler for my AMD cpu because the fan in box was not enough! i bought ThermalRight AXP-100 for AMD |
|
December 4, 2014, 09:50 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 1,167
Rep Power: 23 |
Both the i7-4930K and AMD-6344 have quad channel memory, so they should both do very well for CFD, but I would guess the i7-4930K would be slightly better.
HyperNova, You are running your AMD in an unbalanced Memory configuration. You should have each of the two memory channels populated evenly, which means using either two or four DIMMs, not three. Remove one so that you have bank 1 of channels 1 and 2 populated, and you should see performance increase. Let me know how much if you make this change. |
|
December 4, 2014, 14:56 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
B_Kia
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ir
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 11 |
hi evcelica,
about the unbalance you were right , today i bought another module and now i have 4*4gig 1866 ,i did not compare but i feel the performance increased just not because of increasing the amount of memory but for the configuration (my mesh size is 600000cells) , and i think 4*4 is better than 2*8 (with the same mesh size even! because i feel cpu have more ways to save data), what is your opinion ? thanks |
|
December 5, 2014, 10:11 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 1,167
Rep Power: 23 |
Agreed, I have seen better performance with 2 DIMMs per channel than with just 1. I've also read it is faster, but only slightly. Either way is much better than an unbalanced configuration of one channel with 2 DIMMs and the other with only 1 DIMM. This unbalanced memory population causes a HUGE performance loss.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OpenFOAM] Color display problem to view OpenFOAM results. | Sargam05 | ParaView | 16 | May 11, 2013 00:10 |
CFX11 + Fortran compiler ? | Mohan | CFX | 20 | March 30, 2011 18:56 |
AMD Opteron 280 vs X2 6400+ vs Intel E6750? | phsieh2005 | Main CFD Forum | 2 | December 5, 2007 07:18 |
AMD Opteron vs Intel Xeon | K. Jagus | FLUENT | 8 | May 20, 2005 03:49 |
INTEL vs. AMD | Michael Bo Hansen | CFX | 9 | June 19, 2001 16:54 |