CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Hardware

Intel I7 4930k vs. Amd Opteron 6344

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By evcelica

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 28, 2014, 08:12
Default Intel I7 4930k vs. Amd Opteron 6344
  #1
New Member
 
Burak Kaya
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 14
ferroburak is on a distinguished road
Hi,
Has anyone had the chance to compare the two, Intel I7 4930k vs. Amd Opteron 6344 in terms of Fluent performance?

Thanks.
ferroburak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 2, 2014, 23:30
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
B_Kia
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ir
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 11
HyperNova is on a distinguished road
hi Ferroburak
based on my experience intel cpus is better for CFD ( i work with Fluent ) , i have 2 systems
First, AMD FX 8350 , ASUS M5A 99FX Pro R2.0 , 3*4 gig Ram 1866
2nd, intel i7 4770 , ASUS Z87K , 2*8 gig Ram 1600
i say intel is better and faster , and at highest pressure (using 8 cores) intel has very much lower temperature , for AMD temperature will go more than 70C but for intel it stays belower than 55C , So i had to buy a cpu cooler for my AMD cpu because the fan in box was not enough! i bought ThermalRight AXP-100 for AMD
HyperNova is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2014, 09:50
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 1,167
Rep Power: 23
evcelica is on a distinguished road
Both the i7-4930K and AMD-6344 have quad channel memory, so they should both do very well for CFD, but I would guess the i7-4930K would be slightly better.

HyperNova, You are running your AMD in an unbalanced Memory configuration.
You should have each of the two memory channels populated evenly, which means using either two or four DIMMs, not three. Remove one so that you have bank 1 of channels 1 and 2 populated, and you should see performance increase. Let me know how much if you make this change.
evcelica is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2014, 14:56
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
B_Kia
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ir
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 11
HyperNova is on a distinguished road
hi evcelica,
about the unbalance you were right , today i bought another module and now i have 4*4gig 1866 ,i did not compare but i feel the performance increased just not because of increasing the amount of memory but for the configuration (my mesh size is 600000cells) , and i think 4*4 is better than 2*8 (with the same mesh size even! because i feel cpu have more ways to save data), what is your opinion ? thanks
HyperNova is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 5, 2014, 10:11
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 1,167
Rep Power: 23
evcelica is on a distinguished road
Agreed, I have seen better performance with 2 DIMMs per channel than with just 1. I've also read it is faster, but only slightly. Either way is much better than an unbalanced configuration of one channel with 2 DIMMs and the other with only 1 DIMM. This unbalanced memory population causes a HUGE performance loss.
HyperNova likes this.
evcelica is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[OpenFOAM] Color display problem to view OpenFOAM results. Sargam05 ParaView 16 May 11, 2013 00:10
CFX11 + Fortran compiler ? Mohan CFX 20 March 30, 2011 18:56
AMD Opteron 280 vs X2 6400+ vs Intel E6750? phsieh2005 Main CFD Forum 2 December 5, 2007 07:18
AMD Opteron vs Intel Xeon K. Jagus FLUENT 8 May 20, 2005 03:49
INTEL vs. AMD Michael Bo Hansen CFX 9 June 19, 2001 16:54


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:09.