CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Hardware

i7 8700k vs E5-2690 v2

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By RedoFromStart
  • 2 Post By flotus1

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 25, 2018, 11:32
Default i7 8700k vs E5-2690 v2
  #1
New Member
 
Ahmed Hafez
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 7
AhmedHafez is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am going to get new computer to run Ansys fluent.

There are two configuration which are nearly same price

Configuration one: New Collection

* Processor : i7-7800k (6 Cores/12 Thread - 3.7GHz Base Frequency/ 4.7GHz Turbo Frequency 12 MB cache dual channel with Memory Bandwidth:41.6 GB/s)
* Ram: 2x16GB DDR4-2666 (or might DDR4-3200 MHz with overclocking)
* Storage:250 SSD + 2TB HDD
* No graphics card (gpu with processor will be used)


Configuration two: Used Dell T3610

* Processor: E5-2690 v2 (10 Cores/20 Thread - 3.0 GHz Base Frequency/ 3.6 GHz Turbo Frequency- 25 MB cache quad channel with Memory Bandwidth:59.7 GB/s)
* Ram: 4x8GB ECC DDR3-1866
* Storage:250 SSD + 2TB HDD
* Graphics card: GTX 1030

Which one will be better in simulations?
Thanks
AhmedHafez is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 25, 2018, 19:39
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 8
RedoFromStart is on a distinguished road
I would go with Xeon.
1) Quad Channel, more bendwidth
2) Graphics card for postprocessing.

EDIT:
flotus is more competent when it comes to hardware and I'd go with his advice
AhmedHafez likes this.

Last edited by RedoFromStart; July 26, 2018 at 09:13.
RedoFromStart is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2018, 06:54
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Ahmed Hafez
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 7
AhmedHafez is on a distinguished road
Thank you Redo

Is Bandwidth more important than core speed?
AhmedHafez is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2018, 08:45
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
They should perform about equally in parallel CFD, at least if you use fast memory for the I7.
The latter has the benefit of being much faster for lightly-threaded applications.
I would only consider the older Xeon if it is significantly cheaper than the new platform.
Just to clarify: we are talking about I7-8700k, not I7-7800x?
RedoFromStart and AhmedHafez like this.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 27, 2018, 14:49
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Ahmed Hafez
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 7
AhmedHafez is on a distinguished road
thank you flotus
AhmedHafez is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 30, 2018, 14:58
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Simbelmynė's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 546
Rep Power: 15
Simbelmynė is on a distinguished road
One option is to go with a cheaper Coffee Lake CPU since you will be memory limited anyway. 8600k is a very reasonable choice (and with some mild overclocking it will match the 8700k in games as well). In fact, even the quad core 8350k is a reasonable choice, although it may be bad in many non-memory limited situations.



If you go cheaper CPU then you will be able to spend more on faster RAM. The scaling seems almost linear up to 3200 MHz. We have not had any reported results in the benchmarking thread with higher clocked memory, but I expect the scaling to continue since Coffee Lake @ 4.7 GHz is way too fast for dual channel memory.
Simbelmynė is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:29.