|
[Sponsors] |
November 9, 2019, 08:27 |
Compute build for CFD
|
#1 |
Member
Nguyen Trong Hiep
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi all,
I want to build my workstation for CFD solve (fluent) should i choose R9 3900x (12C/24T, 3.8 GHz - 4.6 GHz, 64MB) or Threadripper 1950x 3.4G TURBO 4.0G / 16 CORE / 32 THREAD for CFD? all have same price. My case is about 5-10 milions cell tetra mesh. Thanks. |
|
November 10, 2019, 10:25 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 546
Rep Power: 15 |
Both have very similar performance according to the benchmark thread.
1920X may be a good option if you wish to save some money. |
|
November 10, 2019, 12:12 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46 |
I would make the following argument about these benchmark figures:
With the same amount of effort put into optimization, a Zen1-based Threadripper CPU will be faster than a Zen2-based Ryzen CPU. If I recall correctly, both third gen Ryzen results were obtained after substantial optimization of the memory subsystem. Sure, Zen1 has its limits in this particular department, and the cores are slower. But it is still 4 vs 2 memory channels. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SU2 Parallel Build Install Issue | jclegg | SU2 | 4 | October 20, 2020 04:28 |
Compute Cluster with diskless compute nodes | Pauli | Hardware | 0 | October 6, 2015 16:48 |
Building from Source on Windows using Cygwin64 | ericthefatguy | SU2 | 2 | May 12, 2015 18:23 |
SU2 3.0 build failure | waku2005 | SU2 Installation | 4 | January 24, 2014 12:40 |
Hardware build review/advise for student desktop | AerE | Hardware | 10 | July 5, 2013 06:03 |