|
[Sponsors] |
March 10, 2020, 12:55 |
INTEL or AMD EPYC ROME for ANSYS Mechanical
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 1,167
Rep Power: 23 |
I am purchasing two workstations for CFD (CFX) as well as FEA (ANSYS Mechanical)
OS will be windows 10. I was leaning towards EPYC ROME 7302, but have seen a fair amount of literature stating INTEL should be better for ANSYS mechanical. The mechanical benchmarks in this presentation are only for EPYC naples. And show lower performance than Intel. But so do the CFD benchmarks between INTEL and EPYC Naples. While the CFD benchmarks for INTEL vs ROME, show ROME on top, which has been proven around here as well. http://www.ozeninc.com/wp-content/up...entation-1.pdf The ANSYS hardware recommendations say Intel CPUs should be used because of AVX512 support. https://www.simutechgroup.com/suppor...rdware-support Also, most of the time I will not be using all cores on the node, I will probably only be solving on 8 cores (16 max). Anyone have any mechanical benchmarks for XEON GOLD vs EPYC ROME on a core to core basis? Any advice for picking between the two? Thanks in advance, Erik |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Xeon Gold Cascade Lake vs Epyc Rome - CFX & Fluent - Benchmarks (Windows Server 2019) | SLC | Hardware | 18 | June 13, 2020 16:48 |
New 128 mini cluster - Cascade Lake SP or EPYC Rome? | SLC | Hardware | 8 | December 16, 2019 16:25 |
AMD Epyc CFD benchmarks with Ansys Fluent | flotus1 | Hardware | 55 | November 12, 2018 05:33 |
[OpenFOAM] Color display problem to view OpenFOAM results. | Sargam05 | ParaView | 16 | May 11, 2013 00:10 |
CFX11 + Fortran compiler ? | Mohan | CFX | 20 | March 30, 2011 18:56 |