CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Hardware

Abaqus job running slower on expensive servers than on a basic PC

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 22, 2021, 05:06
Default Abaqus job running slower on expensive servers than on a basic PC
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4
Huiw is on a distinguished road
hi everyone
Our laboratory has two server :
dual 7H12 16*32G 3200 (mem r/w 310GB/s 230GB/s)
dual 8180 12*16G 2666 (mem r/w 233GB/s 160GB/s)

I have a brick structure analysis job in abaqus2020 standard under win10 .The strange thing is that no matter how I change the option (such as bios set,core or mem used) they are all slower than my pc(9700 16g).
I think the server should be faster than my pc.did anyone know what should I do?
Huiw is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 22, 2021, 10:45
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
Tell us more: what kind of job is it? Element count, anything special about it like e.g. thousands of contacts...
How do you run it? Particularly how many cores are you trying to use on each machine?
And please quantify how much slower we are talking about.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2021, 02:43
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4
Huiw is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your reply!
it's a seismic wave time history analysis of reinforced concrete frame structure,the model units 450,000 .abaqus standard solver ,nothing special.
Usually it's two times slower (same core 6~8,100% mem,no gpgpu).i guess abaqus needs to set some special parameters in Win10,I tried to use centos7, they have the same speed as i7 in the case of 16 cores(7H12).
Huiw is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2021, 10:32
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4
Huiw is on a distinguished road
I tried to submit the job on the new servers.
dual 6348 16*32 3200
it's very fast even i don’t set any parameters.Maybe abaqus standard solver need CPU up to 4.0G frequency to be fast?is too ridiculous
Huiw is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2021, 03:50
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 4
Cinek_Poland is on a distinguished road
Maybe MPI ? Have you installed MPI ? ? Have you tried run simulation on other windows than 10 ? or linux ?
Cinek_Poland is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2021, 14:51
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 1,167
Rep Power: 23
evcelica is on a distinguished road
If the problem is CPU limited, and not memory bandwidth limited. then your laptop likely has a higher CPU frequency and would be faster. It also has no intra-processor communication, though that shouldn't matter much.

What about the working directory? Are these local directories on the server, or are they having to use a much slower network drive? What drives are being used on each machine?

Is hyperthreading enabled on the servers? This can hurt performance.
evcelica is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2021, 23:54
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4
Huiw is on a distinguished road
Win10.I tried use intel MPI and link to abaqus, but it didn't work.
Huiw is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2021, 00:10
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4
Huiw is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by evcelica View Post
If the problem is CPU limited, and not memory bandwidth limited. then your laptop likely has a higher CPU frequency and would be faster. It also has no intra-processor communication, though that shouldn't matter much.

What about the working directory? Are these local directories on the server, or are they having to use a much slower network drive? What drives are being used on each machine?

Is hyperthreading enabled on the servers? This can hurt performance.
i closed hyperthreading and virtualization.But it didn’t make the speed increase significantly.our working directories on the local HDD.i'm not sure perform will better on SSDs.
Huiw is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 7, 2023, 14:56
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Will Kernkamp
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 316
Rep Power: 12
wkernkamp is on a distinguished road
We have abaqus running fast on the 9700 series PC, slow on two servers that should have much better performance, and then very fast on a new server that should have comparable performance to the other servers.


The problem is therefore with the two under performing servers. So far, insufficient performance tracking information was provided on these servers to trouble shoot. There is no reason why the third server 6348 cpus does not have the same problem. So it would be helpful to know the exact number of cores that the problem ran on in each case. Also, whether these servers were possibly doing other work loads at the same time.


Until huiw does his homework, it is no use throwing darts trying to answer his question.
wkernkamp is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
running fluent parallel with MS job scheduler Shamoon Jamshed FLUENT 0 November 15, 2009 12:48
Running parallel job using qsub on sun grid engine nishant_hull OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 February 7, 2008 14:52
error message while running job parallely LYZ FLUENT 0 February 6, 2008 22:20
warning in the fluent job running sisir FLUENT 1 June 3, 2007 06:05
Running Gambit as a batch job Narayan FLUENT 3 March 23, 2000 09:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:44.