CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Hardware

A workstation for CFD optimization and FSI

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 9, 2023, 02:26
Default A workstation for CFD optimization and FSI
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 2
mehmet23 is on a distinguished road
We are looking for a workstation with the following specs:

Field: CFD RANS, shape optimization, unsteady simulations, fluid-structure interaction (FSI)

mesh size: around 10 to 25 million cells

cores: infinite

Software: Ansys Fluent and Mechanical

budget: 10k to 25k $ (for the hardware)

As an initial selection, I have chosen the attached workstations from Titancomputers with approximately 18k $ for both choices...

1. Any preference between the 2 selections? it looks like the Epyc one is better but I'm not sure!!
2. Does anything look weird in these configurations?
3. any better suggestions? advices?...

Any help will be appreciated...
thanks in advance
Attached Images
File Type: jpg epyc.jpg (72.1 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg xeon.jpg (74.1 KB, 7 views)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Epyc.pdf (114.0 KB, 14 views)
File Type: pdf .xeon.pdf (171.3 KB, 8 views)
mehmet23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2023, 07:30
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Will Kernkamp
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 316
Rep Power: 12
wkernkamp is on a distinguished road
Both systems are offered with 8x32GB, that is 8 DIMMs. You need to have 16 DIMMS to use all memory channels.
wkernkamp is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2023, 08:02
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 2
mehmet23 is on a distinguished road
Thank you for the notice... I will replace it with 16x16gb
mehmet23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2023, 08:10
Default
  #4
Member
 
Erik Andresen
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Denmark
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 10
ErikAdr is on a distinguished road
At that price range I would only consider systems with DDR5 memory. Memory bandwidth is important for CFD. Both Intel and AMDs newer CPUs are made for DDR5 memory. All memory channels should be used.
ErikAdr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2023, 11:58
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 2
mehmet23 is on a distinguished road
thanks for your reply

1) with a similar price, we have the 64 cores Genoa 9554 with 8x32gb DDR5... would it still be better than the 2xMilan 7573x with 16 DIMMs DDR4?

2) a better choice will be the 2xGenoa 9374F and 24x16gb RAM with additional 2k$... Does it worth it for my applications?
mehmet23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2023, 12:29
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 195
Rep Power: 14
CFDfan is on a distinguished road
[QUOTE
Any help will be appreciated...
thanks in advance[/QUOTE]

I would be concerned about the coolers selected and suspect the CPUs will be thermally throttled (and run with lower speeds) and would've contacted the manufacturer to clarify that. For example, the TDP of the AMD processor is listed as up to 280W, while the selected AMD cooler has a TDP of 180W (https://www.amazon.com/3800rpm-P0064...s%2C121&sr=8-3).
This is not a good ratio to run the CPU at the turbo frequency.

I didn't check the corresponding parameters of the Intel system.

Also my first impression is that the systems are greatly overpriced. I would check the prices of the parts at Amazon and Newegg.
CFDfan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2023, 13:32
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 2
mehmet23 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by CFDfan View Post
I would be concerned about the coolers selected and suspect the CPUs will be thermally throttled (and run with lower speeds) and would've contacted the manufacturer to clarify that. For example, the TDP of the AMD processor is listed as up to 280W, while the selected AMD cooler has a TDP of 180W (https://www.amazon.com/3800rpm-P0064...s%2C121&sr=8-3).
This is not a good ratio to run the CPU at the turbo frequency.
Thanks for the comment. I think that the TDP on Amazon is not correct! I checked it on the supermicro website:
Supported CPU TDP: Up to 280 Watts
https://store.supermicro.com/us_en/4...-p0064ap4.html

Quote:
Originally Posted by CFDfan View Post
Also my first impression is that the systems are greatly overpriced. I would check the prices of the parts at Amazon and Newegg.
thanks again, this will be considered... Our concern at this stage is to find the best configuration with an estimate for the price limit.
mehmet23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2023, 21:26
Default
  #8
Member
 
Guillaume Jolly
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 10
trampoCFD is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to trampoCFD
Hello Mehmet, I'd recommend you go with Genoa 9454 instead of 9374F.
Genoa Epyc processors have sufficient memory bandwidth for 48 cores.
I calculated the performance improvements in Star-CCM+ to be around 27%. I expect similar performance with Fluent, not sure with Mechanical.
trampoCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 10, 2023, 05:28
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 2
mehmet23 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by trampoCFD View Post
Hello Mehmet, I'd recommend you go with Genoa 9454 instead of 9374F.
Genoa Epyc processors have sufficient memory bandwidth for 48 cores.
I calculated the performance improvements in Star-CCM+ to be around 27%. I expect similar performance with Fluent, not sure with Mechanical.
thanks for the advice
mehmet23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to define a shape deformation using the grid deformation variables (FSI problem) momo_sjx SU2 Shape Design 6 June 7, 2015 22:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54.