CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Solver for the lift coefficient

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 10, 2012, 01:57
Default Solver for the lift coefficient
  #1
New Member
 
sumit_raised's Avatar
 
Sumit Chamling Rai
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 16
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 14
sumit_raised is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to sumit_raised
Hello everyone,

I have this basic question kept striking my mind that whether we can predict the coefficient of lift of a cambered airfoil (symmetric/non tapered) without first actually getting it tested in a wind tunnel?

If so, anyone please help me with the most basic doubt of mine and help me find a solver that best suits it. ( I basically look forward to FLUENT AND CFX).

I am a total novice in this field and desperate to know it.

Thanks to everyone.
sumit_raised is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 15, 2012, 19:58
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Ricardo
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 14
ricardo.costa is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sumit_raised View Post
Hello everyone,

I have this basic question kept striking my mind that whether we can predict the coefficient of lift of a cambered airfoil (symmetric/non tapered) without first actually getting it tested in a wind tunnel?

If so, anyone please help me with the most basic doubt of mine and help me find a solver that best suits it. ( I basically look forward to FLUENT AND CFX).

I am a total novice in this field and desperate to know it.

Thanks to everyone.
Hello,

Try to get Xfoil software. You can download it from

http://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/xfoil/

You can simulate modified profiles getting the new Cl and Cd curves.

For this simply case, its not necessary fluent or CFX.

Ricardo
ricardo.costa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2012, 14:01
Default
  #3
New Member
 
sumit_raised's Avatar
 
Sumit Chamling Rai
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 16
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 14
sumit_raised is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to sumit_raised
Thanks a lot Ricardo for giving your time to write me.

But does that mean that I should convince myself that there is a possibility to get the lift coefficient through FLUENT or CFX?

Thanking You
sumit_raised is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2012, 08:56
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
truffaldino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 249
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 17
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
What is the range of reynolds numbers and type of airfoils you are going to test?

If your airfoil is more or less standard and flow is sub-sonic, it is better to use x-foil, since you will get much less accurate result with RANS modelling of turbulence in FLUENT or similar CFD software.

Flow separation with laminar-turbulent transition at low Re numbers is a very weak point of software that uses RANS models.

Truffaldino
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2012, 13:14
Default
  #5
New Member
 
sumit_raised's Avatar
 
Sumit Chamling Rai
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 16
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 14
sumit_raised is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to sumit_raised
Thank you truffaldino

My reynolds number is definitely not to exceed laminar constraints and flow is subsonic. But you gave me an excellent idea about the two software I was confused with.

When I switched to the above link [as stated by ricardo.costa], I found link to many other softwares like xfoil, Javafoil, Designfoil, XLR5 as well.

So I wonder, what models do they use to get all those readings. And moreover if the data of each and every airfoil is predefined in the program then how can they have such low size in the disk.?

Thanking you

sumit_raised
sumit_raised is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2012, 13:16
Default
  #6
New Member
 
sumit_raised's Avatar
 
Sumit Chamling Rai
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 16
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 14
sumit_raised is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to sumit_raised
Thank you truffaldino

My reynolds number is definitely not to exceed laminar constraints and flow is subsonic. But you gave me an excellent idea about the two software I was confused with.

When I switched to the above link [as stated by ricardo.costa], I found link to many other softwares like xfoil, Javafoil, Designfoil, XLR5 as well.

So I wonder, what models do they use to get all those readings. And moreover if the data of each and every airfoil is predefined in the program then how can they have such low size in the disk.?

Thanking you

sumit_raised
sumit_raised is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2012, 15:50
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
truffaldino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 249
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 17
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
Hello Sumit_raise,

Not of all software you found is quite good. I do not advice to use Javafoil as it uses a quite primitive boundary layer method and could be very innacurate.

XFLR5 and Xfoil are essentially the same: XFLR5 uses Xfoil for each 2D section to get a polar of the whole wing/aircraft.

Xfoil is indeed of a very small size and very fast: basically you could spent weeks of run-time doing Large Eddy Simulation with CFD-sotware like FLUENT, while X-foil will give you a result with the same accuracy just in a fraction of second.

Since Xfoil is based on different principles and does not solve directly Navier-Stokes equation directly on big meshes, it is faster and much more smaller, but it only works for flows with moderate separation regions, where viscous-inviscid bl interaction approximation is valid. To locate laminar-turbulent transition it uses some tabulated data from orr-sommerfeld theory in cojunction with empirical e^n method.

This software gives a quite accurate results for more or less conventional airfoils, but it is not applicable to a flow past cylinders, squares, stepped airfoils and other exotic stuff.


Truffaldino
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 10, 2012, 03:09
Default
  #8
New Member
 
sumit_raised's Avatar
 
Sumit Chamling Rai
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 16
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 14
sumit_raised is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to sumit_raised
Thank You so much Truffaldino.

That is very informative for me as a beginner to differentiate them. Thanks a lot.

sumit_raised is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2013, 05:50
Default
  #9
New Member
 
M. Abdul Akbar
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 13
akku is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by truffaldino View Post
Hello Sumit_raise,

Not of all software you found is quite good. I do not advice to use Javafoil as it uses a quite primitive boundary layer method and could be very innacurate.

XFLR5 and Xfoil are essentially the same: XFLR5 uses Xfoil for each 2D section to get a polar of the whole wing/aircraft.

Xfoil is indeed of a very small size and very fast: basically you could spent weeks of run-time doing Large Eddy Simulation with CFD-sotware like FLUENT, while X-foil will give you a result with the same accuracy just in a fraction of second.

Since Xfoil is based on different principles and does not solve directly Navier-Stokes equation directly on big meshes, it is faster and much more smaller, but it only works for flows with moderate separation regions, where viscous-inviscid bl interaction approximation is valid. To locate laminar-turbulent transition it uses some tabulated data from orr-sommerfeld theory in cojunction with empirical e^n method.

This software gives a quite accurate results for more or less conventional airfoils, but it is not applicable to a flow past cylinders, squares, stepped airfoils and other exotic stuff.


Truffaldino
Hi truffaldino,

Is Xfoil a good software for obtaining lift and drag coefficients of aerofoils that are in low Reynolds number regime (typical of vertical axis wind turbines) ??.

Thanks
akku is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2013, 12:20
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
truffaldino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 249
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 17
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by akku View Post
Hi truffaldino,

Is Xfoil a good software for obtaining lift and drag coefficients of aerofoils that are in low Reynolds number regime (typical of vertical axis wind turbines) ??.

Thanks
To my knowledge it is the best software for getting Cl and Cd of 2D airfoils for Re about 10^5 and above

As for other softwares: I have tried RANS with Fluent and it is much less accurate, LES with fluent takes an enormous time and seeems to be also less accurate than Xfoil
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 21, 2014, 05:00
Default
  #11
New Member
 
M. Abdul Akbar
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 13
akku is on a distinguished road
Hi truffaldino,

Thanks. This reply might be coming after 9 months but nevertheless, it is on course because ever since your last response, I have downloaded XFLR5 and have started playing around with it.

The following are the three methods to find lift and drag coefficients

by RANS method using OpenFOAM
by LES method using FLUENT
by Vortex lattice method using XFLR5

My questions are the following:
1) Are there any other methods to find the lift and drag co-efficient other than those three mentioned above
2) For LES method, is there any Open source free software which is equivalent to FLUENT

Looking forward to your response.

Thanks in advance

Regards,
Abdul Akbar
akku is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 21, 2014, 09:56
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
truffaldino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 249
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 17
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
Open Foam has a large libray of LES models. I am unaware of other free software implementing LES. Maybe other people on this forum knows more about this matter?
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfd, lift coefficient

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
lift coefficient -1.#IND arashm FLUENT 0 July 28, 2010 12:13
Question on the calculation of lift coefficient mbt Main CFD Forum 2 February 27, 2010 08:51
Drag coefficient as a solver criterium sanchezz CFX 1 January 4, 2010 19:30
Drag coefficient & Lift coefficient?? mehrdadeng CFX 15 December 9, 2009 22:49
Fluctuating lift in unsteady solver Sham FLUENT 1 August 6, 2007 05:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:24.