|
[Sponsors] |
Does 2-d turbulence modelling have any significance? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 23, 2012, 14:56 |
Does 2-d turbulence modelling have any significance?
|
#1 |
New Member
Arijit Hazra
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 15 |
In my bachelor thesis, I am working with a two-dimenional Navier-Stokes equation with a eddy-viscosity turbulence model for turbomachinery applications(turbine to be specific).I have a 2-d Solver only and results for that.
If turbulence is always three dimensional is there any justificattion can I forward for using a two dimensional N-S eqn with an eddy-viscosity model? Is it generally used even in conceptual design phase in industry or anywhere? though it will not properly capture the physics of the flow will it be able to capture the physics too some extent? how can I defend my postion actually?Becos I do not have time to develope a 3d model with turbulence and I have to give some justification actually. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
modelling zero gradient of turbulence | amirbahador | FLUENT | 0 | September 25, 2010 06:37 |
Turbulence modelling | kluni | Main CFD Forum | 6 | December 1, 2009 16:46 |
Turbulence Modelling | Rick | FLUENT | 1 | February 17, 2007 18:02 |
modelling transition with v2f turbulence model | pablo | FLUENT | 0 | August 7, 2006 15:44 |
Turbulence Modelling | Himanshu Almadi | FLUENT | 1 | April 11, 2006 23:32 |