
[Sponsors] 
October 8, 2012, 09:01 
pressure drop  pipe flow

#1 
Member
CC
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 8 
Sponsored Links
I want simulate a pipe flow in fluent... the inlet and outlet are linked by periodic boundary conditions... In the pressure gradient (periodic boundary condition) I have a value, but in the static pressure profile I have negative values. I want compare the pressure drop with an experimental value. My question is: what value should I use? Thanks 

Sponsored Links 
October 8, 2012, 10:36 

#2 
Senior Member
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,509
Rep Power: 25 
First of all: If you specify your periodic interface with a pressure drop, then there is no point in comparing the pressure drop obtained in the simulation with experimental data.
You could compare mass flow this way. If you want to compare pressure drop, define a mass flow. Then again, the result of your simulation with a highly nonlinear pressure drop (even an increase at the inlet) doesn't look trustworthy. There must be something wrong with your setup. The issue with negative static pressure is just a question of normalization. The pressure derivative (pressure drop) is unaffected by this issue. 

October 9, 2012, 15:03 

#3 
Senior Member
Chris DeGroot
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 388
Rep Power: 8 
In Fluent, the periodic pressure condition is imposed by decomposing the pressure gradient into a constant part and a varying part, i.e. . The constant part is imposed as a body force and the varying part is imposed as a surface force. The constant part is iterated to satisfy your mass flow rate and the varying part is solved for. For a fullydeveloped pipe flow, the constant part is your pressure gradient along the pipe and the varying part is zero (since the pressure profile is linear). When you plot a contour, Fluent plots the varying part of the pressure. As you can see, the magnitude of your pressures are less than one Pascal which is negligible (numerical error). Ignore this and look at the constant part. The first image you posted shows your answer for the constant pressure gradient along the pipe's axis.


November 17, 2012, 10:55 

#4 
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 7 
Thanks for the elaborate explanation. I am having problems postprocessing periodic flows, for example how do you get the pressure drop to use in the calculation of the friction factors? Do you use the varying part or the constant part? How do you get these to parts in post processing?


November 19, 2012, 10:05 

#5 
Member
CC
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 8 
Dear Chris DeGroot,
Thank you for your explanation 

November 19, 2012, 10:12 

#6 
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 7 
Quote:


November 19, 2012, 11:02 

#7 
Senior Member
Chris DeGroot
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 388
Rep Power: 8 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Unsteady pressure differential between inlet and outlet of the pipe for single phase  joshi20h  FLUENT  0  September 26, 2012 12:41 
Review: Reversed flow  CRT  FLUENT  0  July 20, 2012 13:03 
steam flow in a pipe driven by a pressure gradient between inlet and outlet  SalvoCalvo  Main CFD Forum  0  March 11, 2010 07:52 
Pressure Drop  Please Help  Simple Pipe Flow  Joe A.  FLUENT  2  April 23, 2007 07:50 
Gas pressure question  Dan Moskal  Main CFD Forum  0  October 24, 2002 22:02 
Sponsored Links 