|
[Sponsors] |
March 24, 2013, 09:27 |
Time step for implicit solver
|
#1 |
Super Moderator
|
I am simulating low pressure turbine unsteady flow and I have couple of questions:
1. How to decide time step for the implicit solver? 2. Do we need to satisfy CFL < 1 for implicit solver? 3. Why implicit solver is preferred in commercial codes and as I understand for unsteady flows explicit solver would be better option. 4. Or explicit solver is only efficient in LES where turbulent scales to be resolved are the same order as the time step dictated by CFL < 0.2 condition? 5. For the same geometry and flow, time step is inversely proportional to Reynolds number? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time step size and max iterations per time step | pUl| | FLUENT | 33 | October 23, 2020 22:50 |
Transient simulation not converging | skabilan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | December 16, 2019 23:12 |
InterFoam negative alpha | karasa03 | OpenFOAM | 7 | December 12, 2013 03:41 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 04:03 |
Problems with simulating TurbFOAM | barath.ezhilan | OpenFOAM | 13 | July 16, 2009 05:55 |