|
[Sponsors] |
March 1, 2007, 17:27 |
Validation: a fundamental question
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hello, i am new cfd beginner and i did some simulation of flow around cylinder at various Reynolds in fluent and cfx to get started. I did mesh dependency study and solution is not varying.
when post-processing the global Cd = f(Re) I obtain for both code the well know curve. I have found an example on the web below: http://imartinez.etsin.upm.es/bk3/c12/Forced%20and%20natural%20convection_archivos/image022.jpg Now if I also calculate the same local Cd for each nodes or face around the cylinder as a function of local Re (Re(theta)) I obtain the following: - with cfx every point of each node or edge are located on this same curve (and the integrated average is). - with fluen the points are not on the curve but the integrated average is. which code is right, fluent or cfx? should friction versus Re follow this curve both globally AND locally or only the global value. Later, I plan do look at the Nusselt as well (global and local) What do you find with the software you use? thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
question about uds | tanven | FLUENT | 2 | July 5, 2015 11:22 |
Fundamental output format control of field values and time | dbxmcf | OpenFOAM | 1 | January 12, 2011 10:50 |
Validation of wind turbine simulations using experimental data of much lower Re | Dorit | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 31, 2010 05:20 |
Question about Table applicaiton. | universez | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | January 12, 2010 20:31 |
Poisson Solver question | Suresh | Main CFD Forum | 3 | August 12, 2005 04:37 |