CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

which way to solve a moving airfoil?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 6, 2007, 01:20
Default which way to solve a moving airfoil?
Posts: n/a
Sponsored Links

my simulation involves moving airfoil in a fluid using SIMLPER FVM mtd. i'm thinking of implemented the ALE formulation. however i'm not sure how should i move the grid...

there's 2 ways - 1. deform the grid, keeping the outer boundary fixed. 2. move the whole grid, outer boundary move.

it seems that the 2nd mtd is much easier & it also preserve the grid quality. but is there any problem with it? i saw quite a few papers where ppl deform the grid instead of moving it...

i'll be very grateful if someone can comment on it. thank you.

  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old   March 6, 2007, 03:07
Default Re: which way to solve a moving airfoil? *NM*
H. Yagubizade
Posts: n/a
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 6, 2007, 09:38
Default Re: which way to solve a moving airfoil?
Posts: n/a
Are you studying the surging motion of airfoil?. In that case the body fitted moving grid is easier to implement than the grid deforming formulation.You might want to look up in for papers by the group of sengupta.They have solved the flapping airfoil problem using a non inertial coordinates and obtained pretty good results.If you are interested in deforming grid case,look for the phd dissertation of young from some australian university.The dissertation is available online.He used deforming grids,I think to study the flapping motion.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 6, 2007, 09:46
Default Re: which way to solve a moving airfoil?
Posts: n/a
Unless the airfoil is deforming, moving the entire grid is easier and eliminates the possibility of re-gridding issues. The downside is that for large motions, regions that were initially gridded in a fine manner to capture separation regions, etc. move into regions of more uniform flow, while regions possibly gridded more coarsely end up (at least momentarily) representing the solution region in areas of large gradients. For angular displacements less than 15-20 deg, I have found that moving the grid is usually sufficient if you start out with a good grid.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HELP - Moving car simulation in fluent Brad Wells FLUENT 6 February 27, 2012 03:14
Simulation of a moving airfoil in Fluent M.Sc_Student Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 2 October 25, 2010 03:08
Simulation of a moving airfoil in Fluent M.Sc_Student FLUENT 2 October 25, 2010 03:03
How to solve airfoil venkateshtl OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 1 February 5, 2009 08:23
Simulating an airfoil using a moving boundary Alejandro CFX 4 January 27, 2007 13:03

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:52.