|
[Sponsors] |
May 18, 2014, 16:21 |
|
#21 | |
Member
RacMat
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
Would it be possible for you to share your geometry with me? I could make another mesh and send that to you so that you can compare the results on your mesh with results on my mesh? Thanks! |
||
May 18, 2014, 16:22 |
|
#22 | |
Member
Seroga
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
My Skype is: seroga_mell. You can find me and that would be, I think, an easier and quicker way to find a solution. |
||
May 19, 2014, 11:10 |
|
#23 | |
New Member
|
Quote:
I dont think there would much difference (in terms of output that you would get) in both the combinations. In one case, for given total P at inlet, static P at outlet and RPM, you would get mass flow rate. In other case, for give mass flow rate and static P at outlet, you would get total P at inlet. So every simulation would give you one point on characteristic curve (Flow rate vs. head). Although in terms of output, its one and the same. But, there are guideline about most accurate to least accurate boundary conditions when it comes to CFD simulation. The total P and static P is at the top (more accurate and stable). So in that case, if the data is available, going for total P at inlet and static P at outlet would make lot of sense. Thanks Vijay |
||
May 19, 2014, 15:53 |
|
#24 |
Member
RacMat
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 13 |
when can we talk?
|
|
May 20, 2014, 02:39 |
|
#25 |
Member
Seroga
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 14 |
||
May 20, 2014, 14:15 |
|
#26 |
Member
RacMat
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 13 |
just sent you a request on skype, could you share the geometry with me on google drive or something?
|
|
May 20, 2014, 15:41 |
|
#27 |
Member
RacMat
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 13 |
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxN...it?usp=sharing
the mesh without the extended inlet and outlet |
|
June 1, 2014, 14:32 |
|
#28 |
Member
RacMat
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 13 |
||
January 14, 2015, 04:36 |
|
#29 | |
Member
AndreiCFD
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
Can you please upload again the Pointwise files for the rotor67. I would appreciate your help. The link that you already got is expired. Many thanks Andrei |
||
November 2, 2016, 13:30 |
|
#30 | |
New Member
Honey
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
M new with turbomachinery cfd and m stuck |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mesh file for flow over a circular cylinder | Ardalan | Main CFD Forum | 7 | December 15, 2020 13:06 |
Domain Imbalance | HMR | CFX | 5 | October 10, 2016 05:57 |
Helicopter Rotor in Hover - Pressure Farfield Boundary Conditions | mjforsteruk | FLUENT | 3 | January 8, 2015 02:47 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 04:15 |
A problem about setting boundary conditions | lyang | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 19, 1999 18:29 |