|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi ppl,
I have some question regarding Overset & ALE (Arbitrary Lagrangianâ€"Eulerian). If one needs to simulate a cylinder moving in a fluid, he can use the ALE formulation of the NS eqns to move or deform the whole grid to acheive this. If he's using overset, where there are now 2 grids - one for cylinder, usually structured and one for background, usually cartesian, what and how should the eqns be solved? Is it the ALE formualation for the cylinder grid, ie with a moving mesh velocity (same as above), and the original non-ALE formulation for the background stationary carteisn grid? Will there be problems at the interface of the 2 grids since they'r using differnt formulations? thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unanswered question | niklas | OpenFOAM | 2 | July 31, 2013 16:03 |
A general question on solving NS equations with an ALE description | Hooman | Main CFD Forum | 4 | September 5, 2011 18:47 |
OpenFOAM-1.6 install cookbook | MadsR | OpenFOAM Installation | 372 | November 20, 2010 11:57 |
A question about dynamic overset grids | JXIA | Main CFD Forum | 4 | January 10, 2008 03:50 |
Question abt. the Riemann analytic solver | jinwon | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 16, 2007 14:11 |