CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Numerical diffusion.

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 26, 2007, 10:52
Default Numerical diffusion.
Posts: n/a
I am solving two-phase shock tube. By an initial condition, the final state of profiles shows the contact discontinuity and the shock front are very close together. Due to such close placement of both of them, the numerical simulation fail to get the reasonable result. I am thinking the reasons.

First, I am using local Lax-Friderich numerical scheme which is least simple but most diffusive one. Thus, due to the relatively large diffusion, the numerical simulation lead to fail Second, I am using minmod limiter which is also least simple but most diffusive one. Thus, it also leads to a relatively large diffusion across the region where the contact discontinuity and shock front closely are located.

How do you think my guesses?

  Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2007, 08:59
Default Re: Numerical diffusion.
Praveen. C
Posts: n/a
You are right in your guesses. You can try to use characteristic variables. Perform both limiting and flux computation in characteristic variables. This is very common in DG methods. You can consult some DGFEM papers for the details.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2007, 11:42
Default Re: Numerical diffusion.
Posts: n/a
I found something after then. Minmod and moment limiter can't give me a reasonable profile even though they worked very well for the common shock tube problem describing by gamma=1.4.

After many reviewing papers, I found another approach named 'maxmod coupled with minmod' can capture the desirable profiles in a challenging example but it still contains wrong features due to some mis-implementation. Have you hear about that?

I found it in the paper, 'A problem-independent limiter for high-order runge-kutta discontinuous galerkin methods',A.Burbeau, Journal of computational physics 169, 111-150(2001).

Due to complex notations, I couldn't fully understand his approach. I am still doing it.

If you experienced it before, please advice me.

Thanks in advance.

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
numerical diffusion in tetrahedral grids Lilly Main CFD Forum 8 May 31, 2011 10:08
Numerical Diffusion in CFX John S. CFX 4 August 17, 2008 19:47
numerical diffusion in 1D Jon Main CFD Forum 2 July 31, 2005 22:58
Estimation of numerical diffusion varghese FLUENT 0 March 24, 2003 05:02

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40.