CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

How to couple navier-stokes to potential flow in a finite volume solver?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 10, 2015, 10:03
Question How to couple navier-stokes to potential flow in a finite volume solver?
  #1
New Member
 
Nederland
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9
PhilipS is on a distinguished road
Hello,
Does anyone know an efficient way of coupling steady NS equations (or RANS) to potential flow on non-overlapping domains, when both flows are solved by a colocated finite volume method? For transient flows, I found a solution that uses the velocity from the PF as a bc for the NS solver, and the pressure from NS is then used in the transient Bernoulli eq. to update the velocity potential on the interface for the PF solver.
For the steady case I tried a kind of pseudo time stepping in the Bernoulli eq but did not manage to get things nice & stable. Any suggestions, references...?

Thanks!

Philip
PhilipS is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 26, 2015, 17:22
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
sbaffini's Avatar
 
Paolo Lampitella
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,890
Blog Entries: 29
Rep Power: 36
sbaffini will become famous soon enoughsbaffini will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to sbaffini
The scalar potential gradient is, actually, a velocity field. Couldn't you use that for the coupling? Just guessing, never tried...
sbaffini is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 27, 2015, 01:56
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Nederland
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9
PhilipS is on a distinguished road
Hi,

thanks for answering, and yes, you can/should use that. I am now skipping the Bernoulli eq for the coupling, and doing it in a more direct way by only matching the velocities with a deferred-correction method. Matched velocities yield both mass & momentum conservation over the interface - that seems good enough.
The steady Bernoulli eq is mainly tricky because if you plug in the pressure (from the NS side) to get an updated velocity/flow potential, the 1/2V.mag^2 term has 2 solutions and taking one of them would probably introduce locking the solution to either in- or outflowing, where you want to leave it free to move from in- to outgoing on the interface, and vv.

Ph
PhilipS is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 27, 2015, 07:19
Default
  #4
Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 10
H0T_S0UP is on a distinguished road
Could you solve the potential flow field first, then use the results as a boundary condition for the region where you use N-S? I would think this would work pretty well if you know where your flow field will be potential.
H0T_S0UP is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 27, 2015, 09:24
Default
  #5
Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 10
H0T_S0UP is on a distinguished road
Actually, it just occurred to me there are codes already that do something similar to this. Interactive Boundary Layer Codes (XFoil) is an example), solve the potential field, then employ a boundary layer solver to resolve the flow near the surface. About a year ago I read a thesis where the Cebeci-Smith model was employed to approximate separation. Ill see if I can get the name
H0T_S0UP is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 27, 2015, 10:05
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Nederland
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9
PhilipS is on a distinguished road
Ok, would be nice if you could give a reference. I am just looking for a general coupling of Pot Flow with NS, in fact not with a special boundary layer code. The idea is to only use NS where it is necessary (viscous effects) and Pot Flow in the rest. As far as I know (and could find), this is often done when combining BEM with FVM or FEM for free surface flows around ships.

Philip
PhilipS is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 27, 2015, 10:21
Default
  #7
Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 10
H0T_S0UP is on a distinguished road
You need to look up interactive boundary methods. They are well documented. Im at work now I cant get yoy anything until later.
H0T_S0UP is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
coupling potential flow, finite volume method, navier-stokes

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finite Volume Roe Solver morteza08 Main CFD Forum 5 January 15, 2011 20:59
LBM Vs navier stokes equations in turbulent fluid flow modeling. sharad_shevate Main CFD Forum 0 August 3, 2009 01:25
transform navier-stokes eq. to euler-eq. pxyz Main CFD Forum 37 July 7, 2006 08:42
Free 2D Axisymmetric Potential Flow Solver for Matlab? Jonas Larsson Main CFD Forum 0 August 13, 2003 09:13
Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for 3-D TVD Finite Volume Solver Axel Rohde Main CFD Forum 3 April 2, 2000 17:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:34.