
[Sponsors] 
May 2, 2008, 06:58 
Finite volume boundary condition

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

I am solving the conservation form of the Euler equations using cellcentered finite volume method.
U + dF/dx + dG/dy = 0 At the wall boundaries I set the derivative of the flux to zero i.e dF/dx = 0 y = wall. However the cell centered velocity for the node adjacent to the wall does not approach zero despite uniform grid refinement. Why is that? Shuo 

May 2, 2008, 10:44 
Re: Finite volume boundary condition

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

zero flux does not mean zero velocity. zero flux basically means no different in velocity accross the wall boundary. you may want to try a noslip boundary instead.
no slip boundary u_i =  u_i1 that way, you can ensure that velocity AT the boundary is zero, and hence the velocity near the boundary will approach 0. 

May 2, 2008, 18:43 
Re: Finite volume boundary condition

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

I did that for the fluxes.
i.e for dU/dt_(i, j) = 1/delta_x(F_(i+0.5, j)  F_(i0.5, j))  1/delta_y(G_(i, j + 0.5)  G_(i, j  0.5)) at wall  (i + 0.5, j) F_(i+0.5, j) = [ 0 P_(i  0.5, j) //boundary condition 0 0 ] G_(i, j + 0.5) = // stays the same [rho_(i, j+0.5)*v_(i, j+0.5) rho_(i, j+0.5)*u_(i, j+0.5)*v_(i, j+0.5) rho_(i, j+0.5)*v_(i, j+0.5)*v_(i, j+0.5) + P_(i, j+0.5) (e_(i, j+0.5) + P_(i, j+0.5))*v_(i, j+0.5) ] 

May 4, 2008, 08:13 
Re: Finite volume boundary condition

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Since you solve Euler (rather NS) equations, there is slip at walls, so you should not expect zero velocity near the wall.


May 4, 2008, 13:16 
Re: Finite volume boundary condition

#5 
Guest
Posts: n/a

no....not for the fluxes...just create a layer of dummy cells along the boundary and change the direction (reverse by 180 degrees) for the NORMAL component at that point in dummy cell. Keep rest things same.viz. in c:
for(i=1;i<=nx;i++) { mirror_dp[i]=dp[i][1]; mirror_pp[i]=pp[i][1]; mirror_up[i]=up[i][1]; mirror_vp[i]=vp[i][1]; mirror_ep[i]=ep[i][1]; mirror_ap[i]=ap[i][1]; //printf("\n%lf %lf %lf %lf %lf %lf",dp[i][4],pp[i][4],up[i][4],vp[i][1],ap[i][1],ep[i][1]); } Also, for cell centered, as the information is stored at the cell center AND NOT AT THE WALL ITSELF, it might be one of the reasons not to get zero velocity at the wall.mail me at a.patil@iitg.ernet.in if reqd. 

May 4, 2008, 22:08 
Re: Finite volume boundary condition

#6 
Guest
Posts: n/a

i am modelling a supersonic impinging jet and the problems occurs for across wall jet. i have about 40 50 grid points across this jet. Is this enough resolution?
Shuo 

May 5, 2008, 11:01 
Re: Finite volume boundary condition

#7 
Guest
Posts: n/a

For the concept of "dummy cells", I recommend you "computational fluid dynamics: principles and applications" written by J. Blazek, 2nd edition. It help you understand the implementation of boundary conditions.


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
mixed inflow/outflow downstream boundary condition question  peob  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  2  August 14, 2014 09:07 
Water subcooled boiling  Attesz  CFX  7  January 5, 2013 04:32 
Rotating interpolated boundary condition  hani  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  0  July 4, 2006 07:09 
Finite difference and Periodic Boundary Condition  Linda  Main CFD Forum  2  May 27, 2003 10:52 
The Boundary Condition about the Flat Plate  boing  Main CFD Forum  1  January 6, 2002 17:53 