LES Filtering

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 12, 2008, 12:12 LES Filtering #1 SONAM Guest   Posts: n/a Hi There, I think you can help me here to understand filtering operation for LES. There are some well known filter functions such as box, Gaussian, spectral, available in the literature to filter the NS/transport equation, in order to obtain the filtered version of the NS equation that would be solved. My question is that, how does one know which filter function is used for filtering as the filtered NS equation remains always same? Even I could not see anything in the SGS part which says this one comes from this filter function. Could you please help me here. Thanks SONAM

 September 12, 2008, 12:41 Re: LES Filtering #2 Andrew Guest   Posts: n/a Nu_t = (Cs*Delta)^2 *|S| in an incompressible flow using the Smagorinsky model. The only information that this model, for example, has on the filter width is through the definition of Delta. The top-hat filter is usually defined as the cube-root of cell volume whilst other types of filter will define Delta in different ways.

 September 12, 2008, 12:51 Re: LES Filtering #3 SONAM Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Andrew, Thanks for your reply. Do you know or any reference for the way Delta is defined in other filter functions? Thanks

 September 13, 2008, 04:22 Re: LES Filtering #4 Paolo Lampitella Guest   Posts: n/a Actually this is not properly true. First, in a formal approach (and also to be sure to remove some kind of error), the variables defined on your grid are not the filtered ones. So to obtain your filtered variables you should effectively perform the filtering. That is, in the formal approach the numerical variables are not the filtered ones. However, the most common and inexpensive approach is to consider the numerical variables as the filtered ones. But this is a strong compromise with several issues on the behaviour of the solution. For an interesting watch on this check the following paper: Carati, Winckelmans, Jeanmart: On the modelling of the subgrid-scale and filtered-scale stress tensors in large-eddy simulation, J. Fluid Mech. (2001), vol. 441, pp. 119-138 Anyway, not considering this, we also have... Second, even with a non-dynamic sgs model, the costant cs is formally dependent on the filter. That is, different filters will give you different cs. Actually the well known 0.17 value comes from the use of the sharp cut-off filter. Anyway, with a more common dynamic sgs model, cs is directly dependent of the filter. That is, to compute the cs you have to filter some stuff. Moreover, if you use a scale similar model (alone or combined with an eddy viscosity model) is the same model which requests some direct filtering. This case is part of the more general case of the models which uses the deconvolution approach. This models actually require the approximate inversion of the filtering and so they require some direct filtering. This is just to tell you about the more common cases in which you have to perform a direct filtering of the variables (to obtain double-filtered variables, triple-filtered and so on). The ways in which the delta's value influences these and other computations are several but, in my knowledge, there is not a dependence of it's value from the kind of filter used. The only dependence that i knows is that of the grid. That is, the grid has some influence on the value of delta. atmcfd likes this.

 September 17, 2008, 05:18 Re: LES Filtering #5 SONAM Guest   Posts: n/a Dear Paolo, Many thanks for your helpful explanation on this. I will get the JFM paper and read to learn more on this aspect. SONAM

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post John Main CFD Forum 2 July 29, 2004 18:03 Tim Main CFD Forum 2 December 10, 2003 14:30 K.K.J.Ranga Dinesh Main CFD Forum 0 July 2, 2003 22:47 Takuya TSUJI Main CFD Forum 1 July 14, 1999 02:17 Luca Liberti Main CFD Forum 0 January 17, 1999 11:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:05.